Re: Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance

Works for me.

- Steve

On 2012-01-03, at 15:55, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> In http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/Overview.xml#conformance
> 
> """
> A conformant SPARQL Protocol service:
> 
>  1. must implement either the query operation or the update operation in the way described in this document ("SPARQL 1.1 Protocol");
> 
>  2. may implement both the query and update operations;
> 
>  3. must implement all three forms of the query operation (query via GET, query via POST with URL-encoded parameters, and query via POST directly) if it implements the query operation
> 
>  4. must implement both forms of the update operation (update via POST with URL-encoded parameters and update via POST directly) if it implements the update operation
> 
>  5. must be consistent with the normative constraints on SPARQL Protocol services (indicated by [RFC2119] keywords) described in 4. Policy Considerations.
> 
> A conformant SPARQL Protocol client:
> 
>  1. must generate requests for either the query operation or the update operation;
> 
>  2. may generate requests for both the query and update operations;
> 
>  3. may generate requests for any or all of the three forms of the query operations if it generates query requests;
> 
>  4. may generate requests for either or both of the two forms of the update operations if it generates update requests;
> 
>  5. must be consistent with the normative constraints on SPARQL Protocol clients (indicated by [RFC2119] keywords) described in 4. Policy Considerations.
> """
> 
> Any suggested changes or support for this?
> 
> Lee
> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2012 17:02:36 UTC