Re: DISTINCT()

On 14/03/12 09:48, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> Just my two cents to emphasize that I tend to agree on that: I
> believe we need DISTINCT() to address JC-4 and related comments in a
> fashion agreeable to the commenters.

Could you expand on "we need DISTINCT"?  Is that just a technical point 
that DISTINCT covers more or a political point about the comments?

What about the lesser case of just {*}{+} and *+ changes?

	Andy

Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 10:02:23 UTC