ConstrainablePattern on remote streams?
[Bug 26937] Proposal: Only allow authenticated origins to access getUserMedia
[Bug 26937] Proposal: Only allow authenticated origins to access getUserMedia
Simplified slides
[Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application
[Bug 26937] Proposal: Only allow authenticated origins to access getUserMedia
[Bug 26937] Proposal: Only allow authenticated origins to access getUserMedia
capture-ACTION-30: Make full review of getusermedia
[Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
[Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
[Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
[Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
Agenda, updated (Media Capture)
[Bug 17704] suggest a parameter in getUserMedia
[Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application
[Bug 26810] Proposal: Introduce promises for device access
Image Capture spec: new version
New mediacapture-main Editor's draft (v20141027)
Video preview proposal: grabPreview
image capture and promises
Agenda TPAC
OverconstrainedError == ConstraintNotSatisfiedError?
Introduce Promise's in gUM draft
RE: New Editor's Draft of MediaStream Image Capture
MediaStreams and canPlayType
RE: Comments on Image Capture draft
[Bug 27077] New: Cababilities need to clearly specify that they are constant over time
- [Bug 27077] Cababilities need to clearly specify that they are constant over time
- Re: [Bug 27077] New: Cababilities need to clearly specify that they are constant over time
[minutes] October 2nd teleconf
PFWG request for user-focused introduction and use cases
Most important values of "timeslice" in MediaStreamRecorder?
TPAC agenda outline proposal
Status of Promise's in gUM discussion
Bug 26939 "what info does the app get when a track ends" - where are we
[Bug 25777] Capabilities seem under specified
[Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
[Bug 25777] Capabilities seem under specified
[Bug 26017] CaptureStream should be specified
[Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application
- Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
[Bug 26017] CaptureStream should be specified
[Bug 25777] Capabilities seem under specified
[mediacapture-depth] Advice on extending CanvasRenderingContext2D to support Depth Streams
[mediacapture-depth] Changing how we define cameraParameters
RE: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
FPWD of Media Capture Depth Stream Extensions published
CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Wild Tangent about Crypto (was Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia)
- Re: Wild Tangent about Crypto (was Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia)
- Re: Wild Tangent about Crypto (was Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia)
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- RE: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
Time split for TPAC
Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins
Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
Fwd: [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL
Re: Request for FPWD of mediacapture-depth
[Bug 26918] DeviceID description needs to say that it's cookie linked
[Bug 26954] New: DeviceID, kind and label needs to be aligned with capabilities.
[Bug 26953] New: Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
[Bug 25794] Make facingMode a VideoFacingModeEnum again once enum default notation is supported in webidl.
Re: Promise slides
[Bug 25794] Make facingMode a VideoFacingModeEnum again once enum default notation is supported in webidl.
[Bug 26111] need typedef of ConstrainVideoFacingMode
[Bug 25810] Change all extensable enum to DomStrings
[Bug 25794] Make facingMode a VideoFacingModeEnum again once enum default notation is supported in webidl.
[Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
geolog
!Promise slides
Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)