- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 12:01:37 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 4 October 2014 19:02:45 UTC
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > Can someone explain to me what the point of not deprecating a > known-bad-thing is? There's not universal agreement that it's bad and people are actually using it. Note that deprecating does not mean immediate > removal. Just issueing warnings that it will be removed down the line > and indicating what the replacement is. If you don't do that, I don't > see why it's realistic to think you can deprecate it in two years > time. > I'm not particularly interested in deprecating it, but I'd be willing to discuss it in a few years. -Ekr
Received on Saturday, 4 October 2014 19:02:45 UTC