Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat from Anne van Kesteren on 2014-10-05 (public-media-capture@w3.org from October 2014)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 09:32:48 +0200
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CADnb78h+K9-qYdvHj81+H9vn6ZpXNu30hy06Q8H2OqJsn4AKzw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
>> Can someone explain to me what the point of not deprecating a
>> known-bad-thing is?
>
> There's not universal agreement that it's bad and people are actually
> using it.

Every single new API is using promises. Can you provide evidence to
the contrary outside this WG?

And again, people are using the prefixed variant. Some migration will
have to happen.

-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Sunday, 5 October 2014 07:33:17 UTC