Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat from Jan-Ivar Bruaroey on 2014-10-07 (public-media-capture@w3.org from October 2014)

From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:14:15 -0400
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <54341157.8090406@mozilla.com>

On 10/7/14, 11:49 AM, Justin Uberti wrote:
> Adam's message covers my position on this issue well. The fact that 
> the existing getUserMedia API is prefixed doesn't mean we can just 
> ignore the existing uses of it.

I don't think anyone is talking about ignoring prefixed uses. I think 
we're talking about ignoring *unprefixed* uses, of which there should be 
none that aren't also covered by prefixed uses. I think we're also 
talking about warning on deprecated (legacy) use.

.: Jan-Ivar :.

Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 16:14:43 UTC