Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application) from Martin Thomson on 2014-10-13 (public-media-capture@w3.org from October 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:18:48 -0700
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWKDNHMh-wmB6Wo=1R=y6TZsX_JNAu8AQ6JZ0gyCo5d-w@mail.gmail.com>

On 13 October 2014 10:14, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
> Exactly when https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26986 is
> fixed. TC39 has been complaining about us introducing objects like
> this since we started doing it so that is way overdue. I recommend
> running API proposals through public-script-coord@w3.org.

That seems like a heavyweight process.  Thankfully, we have you to
remind us when we do things that are undocumented, but somehow wrong.
That seems to be working out so far.

Received on Monday, 13 October 2014 17:19:17 UTC