Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat

On 06/10/2014 11:36 AM, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 10/6/14 10:14, cowwoc wrote:
> >> navigator.getUserMedia = navigator.getUserMedia || 
> navigator.webkitGetUserMedia || navigator.mozGetUserMedia;
> ...
>> The argument goes that we can provide a shim for Promises -> 
>> Callbacks in the same way that you handle prefixes below.
>
> There's a broad difference between "can be done" and "is already done, 
> nearly universally."

I don't understand your reasoning. We don't have to wait for the shim to 
exist to decide on whether it's worthwhile going down that route. Are 
you implying that there would be major difficulties in implementing this?

Gili