- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:27:38 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 10/13/2014 10:36 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> What does "require JavaScript proxies to be implemented in JavaScript" mean? > That you'd be creating something that's not very idiomatic. > > That's not what I asked - I asked what the words meant. What do you mean by "JavaScript proxy" in this context, and what property of the named getter means that the proxy can't be implemented in any other language (such as C++)? I have no doubt that you have reasons for your opinion, but as long as I don't understand what you mean by the words you use to describe those reasons, I can't treat it much differently from "the gostak distims the doshes". (google it for references - I remember it best from the Andrew Breuer story). -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 07:28:09 UTC