Re: [dxwg] Complete Links to Test Suites (#385)
Re: [dxwg] Reference previous HTTP Accept work (esp JSON-LD) (#382)
Prof minutes 404
[dxwg] PROF roles and their definitions (#1049)
Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
[dxwg] Should PROF roles be in a their own namespace? (#1048)
dxwg-ACTION-362: Propose generalising syntax for the ietf doc to bypass hard requriement for token indicator
Closed: [dxwg] Determine how to reference ResourceRole vocab (#452)
Re: [dxwg] Determine how to reference ResourceRole vocab (#452)
PROF meeting IRC
[dxwg] Pull Request: conformstTo isolated example
[dxwg] Pull Request: addressing issues found in Issue 492
[dxwg] Pull Request: addressing issues found in Issue 492
[dxwg] Pull Request: conformstTo isolated example
Re: [dxwg] Provide an example of both a profile and a resource adhereing to it (#455)
Re: [dxwg] Reference ADMS (#401)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update config.js
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update config.js
PROF weekly meetings - Thursdays, 11AM UTC
Agenda for PROF meeting - 26hrs
ODRL use of PROF
Closed: [dxwg] Complete the information transfer from previous HTML doc (#406)
Re: [dxwg] Complete the information transfer from previous HTML doc (#406)
Re: [dxwg] Web browser navigation of profile information (#239)
Closed: [dxwg] Query string implementation of profile selection (#544)
Closed: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575)
Closed: [dxwg] Map get resource by profile preferencing from abstract to HTTP & QSA (#591)
Closed: [dxwg] Determine responsibilities for listing available profiles when a redirect is used (#603)
Closed: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852)
Closed: [dxwg] Should a server list all profiles it supports, even those in a hierarchy (#932)
Closed: [dxwg] CONNEG: Reference to WFS3 (#942)
Closed: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
Re: [dxwg] PROF namespace in document (#798)
dxwg-ACTION-361: Write an intro for a poll to approve dcat as cr, send to chairs.
out this week and next
Closed: [dxwg] usage note and definition for odrl:hasPolicy need to be updated in TTL (#987)
Closed: [dxwg] [I18N] Various date types could be more specific (#957)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
Closed: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025)
Agenda for CNEG Subgroup meeting 2019-08-22
Agenda, August 27
Please respond to polls ASAP
Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
ACTION NEEDED: Poll on Profiles-related work.
ACTION NEEDED: Poll on Profiles-related work.
PROF meeting times - poll
Issue closing procedure
Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
Profiles Vocabulary critical path
Re: [dxwg] PROF - VOAF alignment (#235)
Re: [dxwg] Confused by the eg-ga example (#199)
Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808)
Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
Closed: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
Re: [dxwg] Indicate / explain dagram formalisms (#697)
Re: [dxwg] Unused namspaces in profilescont.ttl (#688)
Re: [dxwg] Ambiguous relationship in Figure 1 (#687)
Re: [dxwg] Ambiguity in Abstract and Introduction (#686)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Insert FEATURE AT RISK warnings
[dxwg] Pull Request: Insert FEATURE AT RISK warnings
PROF mini-meeting in 4 hours
Agenda for CNEG Subgroup Meeting 2019-08-22T12:00
Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400)
dxwg-ACTION-360: Poll full wg to decide on taking profiles work off hold, to determine who is interested/available to do any work on these, and to determine on the basis of information from plh what type of output we are going for
dxwg-ACTION-359: to contact plh to work out shortest path to rec for profiles vocab
Re: [dxwg] Unfishined renaming of properties in profiles ontology causing loading error (#555)
Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
Closed: [dxwg] Profiles may be written in or may link to a document or schema in a validation language (ShEx, SHACL, XMLschema). [ID41] (5.41) (#279)
Changed label for PROF
Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
Re: [dxwg] CONNEG: Reference to WFS3 (#942)
DXWG Plenary - 2019-08-20T20:00:00
Closed: [dxwg] Visual clues in Figures 3 and 4 (#689)
Closed: [dxwg] Alignment / differentiation with OWL (#696)
Re: [dxwg] Alignment / differentiation with OWL (#696)
Closed: [dxwg] Compile PROF implementation evidence (#681)
Re: [dxwg] Compile PROF implementation evidence (#681)
Closed: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661)
Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661)
[dxwg] Review transitivity intentions & descriptions (#1043)
Closed: [dxwg] Clarify use of dct:conformsTo perhaps with additional properties (#660)
Re: [dxwg] Clarify use of dct:conformsTo perhaps with additional properties (#660)
Closed: [dxwg] Better description of application profiles, profiles in general and how they may be used (#659)
Re: [dxwg] Better description of application profiles, profiles in general and how they may be used (#659)
Closed: [dxwg] Update all example RDF and image files (#658)
Re: [dxwg] Update all example RDF and image files (#658)
Closed: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644)
Re: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644)
Closed: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
Closed: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
Re: [dxwg] Jaroslav's profiles ont doc edits (#570)
Closed: [dxwg] Jaroslav's profiles ont doc edits (#570)
Closed: [dxwg] Harmonise Ont/Conneg references and content (#551)
Re: [dxwg] Harmonise Ont/Conneg references and content (#551)
Closed: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
Closed: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
Closed: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524)
Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524)
- Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524)
- Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524)
- Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524)
- Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524)
Re: [dxwg] Emulate dcat:mediaType instead of dct:format (#519)
Closed: [dxwg] Emulate dcat:mediaType instead of dct:format (#519)
Re: [dxwg] What does prof:profileOf entail? (#507)
Re: [dxwg] DCAT-Rev profile to simulate 2014/DCAT-AP (#499)
Closed: [dxwg] Determine which examples of use are to be published in the Profiles Ont doc (#492)
Re: [dxwg] Determine which examples of use are to be published in the Profiles Ont doc (#492)
Closed: [dxwg] Profiles may be written in or may link to a document or schema in a validation language (ShEx, SHACL, XMLschema). [ID41] (5.41) (#279)
Closed: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
Closed: [dxwg] Announce the PROF FPWD via email (#493)
Closed: [dxwg] profile ontology: rdfs:Class vs owl:Class inconsistency between turtle and document (#483)
Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ont doc Security and Privacy (#479)
Closed: [dxwg] Profiles Ont doc Security and Privacy (#479)
Closed: [dxwg] Model implementation reporting as done in SHACL (#467)
Re: [dxwg] Model implementation reporting as done in SHACL (#467)
Closed: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
Re: [dxwg] Reference PROV (#402)
Closed: [dxwg] Determine how to reference ResourceRole vocab (#452)
Re: [dxwg] Defining validation (#449)
Re: [dxwg] Seek a second profiles implementation (#409)
Closed: [dxwg] Seek a second profiles implementation (#409)
Re: [dxwg] Complete CSIRO's profiles implementation description (#408)
- Re: [dxwg] Complete CSIRO's profiles implementation description (#408)
- Re: [dxwg] Complete CSIRO's profiles implementation description (#408)
Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407)
Closed: [dxwg] Complete the information transfer from previous HTML doc (#406)
Re: [dxwg] Complete PROF/x alignments (#405)
Re: [dxwg] Profiles should be able to indicate which external specifications are expected to be applied/have been applied to values of individual properties [ID43] (5.43) (#280)
Re: [dxwg] Profiles may be written in or may link to a document or schema in a validation language (ShEx, SHACL, XMLschema). [ID41] (5.41) (#279)
Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
Re: [dxwg] Map get resource by profile preferencing from abstract to HTTP & QSA (#591)
Closed: [dxwg] QSA Profile Conneg realisation must support QSA discovery (#538)
Closed: [dxwg] Consider not using _profile QSA key for _profile=list (#589)
Closed: [dxwg] List profiles for dynamic resources (#785)
Closed: [dxwg] Decide on a way of conveying URI / token mappings (#904)
Closed: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
Canceled: DCAT sub-group (April-October schedule)
[dxwg] Appendix showing an example of of conneg use in DCAT (#1042)
DXWG Plenary 2019-08-13T20:00:00
[dxwg] Align Alternative Representations Model and PROF (#1041)
- Re: [dxwg] Align Alternative Representations Model and PROF (#1041)
- Re: [dxwg] Align Alternative Representations Model and PROF (#1041)
- Re: [dxwg] Align Alternative Representations Model and PROF (#1041)
Re: [dxwg] Determine responsibilities for listing available profiles when a redirect is used (#603)
[dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040)
- Re: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040)
- Re: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040)
- Re: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040)
- Re: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040)
- Closed: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg redefs
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg redefs
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg altprofiles model
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg altprofiles model
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg action 356
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg action 356
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg editorial
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg editorial
[dxwg] Pull Request: Italian translation starting from pr1034
[dxwg] Pull Request: Italian translation starting from pr1034
Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
Re: [dxwg] List profiles for dynamic resources (#785)
Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852)
- Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852)
- Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852)
- Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852)
- Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852)
[dxwg] Pull Request: dcat-issue-983 - comments -> definitions
[dxwg] Pull Request: dcat-issue-983 - comments -> definitions
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT - Insert missing language tags
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT - Insert missing language tags
[dxwg] Alignment issue between dcat:contactPoint and sdo:contactPoint (#1032)
- Re: [dxwg] Alignment issue between dcat:contactPoint and sdo:contactPoint (#1032)
- Closed: [dxwg] Alignment issue between dcat:contactPoint and sdo:contactPoint (#1032)
- Re: [dxwg] Alignment issue between dcat:contactPoint and sdo:contactPoint (#1032)
Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
- Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
Meeting cancelled:DCAT sub-group call 2019.08.07T20:00:00Z
Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025)
Re: [dxwg] Addressing issue #725 - context for scope notes (#1010)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] Create a data model for representing alternate profiles (#1031)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a data model for representing alternate profiles (#1031)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a data model for representing alternate profiles (#1031)
DCAT sub-group call 2019.08.07T20:00:00Z
Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN] (#74)
Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
Closed: [dxwg] Add an example of a Client/Server scenario demonstrating profile inheritence (#748)
Closed: [dxwg] Explore whether list_profiles operation could be provided by an external component (#602)
Re: [dxwg] Explore whether list_profiles operation could be provided by an external component (#602)
Closed: [dxwg] Reference previous Alternate Views work (#383)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg profiles appendix
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg profiles appendix
Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575)
Agenda for CNEG Meeting 2019-08-08T12:00:00Z
Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Address link checker reports
[dxwg] DCAT broken links (#1029)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Address link checker reports
Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
Re: [dxwg] dcat:byteSize - check constraints (#125)
Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
Fw: Aw: Re: Comments on "Content Negotation by Profile" (30 April)
DXWG Plenary - 2019-08-06T20:00:00
Template for the Candidate Recommendation transition request
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
Closed: [dxwg] Align all Link header requirements & examples (#1027)
Re: [dxwg] Should a server list all profiles it supports, even those in a hierarchy (#932)
- Re: [dxwg] Should a server list all profiles it supports, even those in a hierarchy (#932)
- Re: [dxwg] Should a server list all profiles it supports, even those in a hierarchy (#932)
Fw: Agenda for CNEG subgroup telecon 2019-08-01
Re: [dxwg] Decide on a way of conveying URI / token mappings (#904)
Re: [dxwg] Consider not using _profile QSA key for _profile=list (#589)
Closed: [dxwg] Duplicate Conformance heading (#953)
Re: [dxwg] Duplicate Conformance heading (#953)
Re: [dxwg] QSA Profile Conneg realisation must support QSA discovery (#538)
Closed: [dxwg] Refer to OAI-PMH as an implementation of QSA (#516)
Closed: [dxwg] Support for existing QSA parameter names (#511)
Closed: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384)
Re: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384)
Closed: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)
Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)
- Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)
- Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)