Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808)

Hi Nick
Everything eventually comes to the working group for the say-so to go to
publication, so it's best to think with the end in mind and ensure that the
group as a whole knows about design decisions such as alignment etc and is
prepared (with an understanding of the design rationale etc) and feels that
it has been given enough opportunity to discuss with the editorial team.
In previous votes for the move to publication with other deliverables we
have had the experience of issues coming to the fore late in the day and
then needing discussion to clarify and agree before we could move forward.
Given the extremely tight schedule for the profiles vocabulary I think we
need to go for solving issues and gaining consensus at the earliest
Shall I add this to the plenary meeting agenda for next week?

On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 22:47, Nicholas Car <> wrote:

> Hi Karen,
> We being the editors of PROF.
> I don’t believe we need to bring this to the full group for consensus.
> Neither DCAT nor Conneg has raised every decision they have made with the
> full group.
> The idea came from me: see that I created it and the initial comment for
> the Issue is my work with no references to feedback or quotes from
> elsewhere.
> Nick
> —
> Nicholas Car
> Data Systems Architect
> SURROUND Australia
> 0477 560 177
> > On 23 Aug 2019, at 2:05 am, Karen Coyle via GitHub <>
> wrote:
> >
> > @nicholascar Who is we? Could you bring this to the full group for
> consensus, please. Given how thin we are on the ground, it being August, we
> can add this to the plenary agenda (cc: @pwin ) but may need to conclude it
> via email or poll.
> >
> > I'm not sure where the original idea/issue came from. Could you include
> that information for the discussion? thanks.
> >
> > --
> > GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
> > Please view or discuss this issue at
> using your
> GitHub account
> >

Received on Thursday, 22 August 2019 22:01:11 UTC