- From: Jakub Klímek via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 02:51:58 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@riccardoAlbertoni @dr-shorthair I don't see a discussion related to what was discussed here (i.e. `skos:definition` vs others) in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1010#issuecomment-519081757. The current state concerns me for the following reasons: 1. There are now multiple `skos:definition`s for external vocabularies in one language - one original, one `In scope of DCAT` - this again seems like creating mess. 2. There are `skos:definition`s without a language tag, which is an anti-pattern. All natural language texts in RDF should have a language tag. This might be an oversight, but definitely needs to be fixed, if the next point is not fixed. 3. I do not see the point in copying the original external vocabulary definitions to `skos:definition`s in DCAT, when they are exactly the same. - this again seems like creating mess. ```turtle dct:conformsTo skos:definition "An established standard to which the described resource conforms." ; skos:definition "Un estándar establecido al cuál se ajusta el recurso descripto."@es ; skos:definition "In the context of DCAT 2.0 dcat:Distribution, an established standard to which the distribution conforms."@en ; ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakubklimek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/725#issuecomment-519342384 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2019 02:51:59 UTC