W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > August 2019

Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)

From: David Browning via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 14:42:09 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-519128118-1565188928-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I think this was addresses in #1010 (now merged)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by davebrowning
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/983#issuecomment-519128118 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2019 14:42:10 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Browning via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)"
Previous message: David Browning via GitHub: "[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)"
Maybe reply: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)"
Maybe reply: Simon Cox via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)"
Maybe reply: Simon Cox via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)"
Maybe reply: Nicholas Car via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:31 UTC