aisaac via GitHub
- [dxwg] Should PROF roles be in a their own namespace? (#1048) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Web browser navigation of profile information (#239) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may be written in or may link to a document or schema in a validation language (ShEx, SHACL, XMLschema). [ID41] (5.41) (#279) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] PROF - VOAF alignment (#235) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Should a server list all profiles it supports, even those in a hierarchy (#932) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Tuesday, 6 August)
Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub
Andrea Perego via GitHub
Annette Greiner
Annette Greiner via GitHub
Antoine Isaac
Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)
Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker
- dxwg-ACTION-362: Propose generalising syntax for the ietf doc to bypass hard requriement for token indicator (Thursday, 29 August)
- dxwg-ACTION-361: Write an intro for a poll to approve dcat as cr, send to chairs. (Tuesday, 27 August)
- dxwg-ACTION-360: Poll full wg to decide on taking profiles work off hold, to determine who is interested/available to do any work on these, and to determine on the basis of information from plh what type of output we are going for (Tuesday, 20 August)
- dxwg-ACTION-359: to contact plh to work out shortest path to rec for profiles vocab (Tuesday, 20 August)
- dxwg-ACTION-358: to convene working session to co-develop common model to match link header data and alternates view requirements. (Thursday, 1 August)
- dxwg-ACTION-357: Add examples using 303 redirects (Thursday, 1 August)
- dxwg-ACTION-356: Implement antoine's suggestions as laid out in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/575#issuecomment-515982929 (Thursday, 1 August)
- dxwg-ACTION-355: Respond to tom baker re uris for profiles inside of documents (Thursday, 1 August)
Dave Reynolds via GitHub
David Browning via GitHub
- Closed: [dxwg] usage note and definition for odrl:hasPolicy need to be updated in TTL (#987) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] [I18N] Various date types could be more specific (#957) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Address link checker reports (#1028) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Address link checker reports (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT broken links (#1029) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- [dxwg] DCAT broken links (#1029) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Address link checker reports (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning (Tuesday, 6 August)
david.browning@refinitiv.com
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative via GitHub
Erik Wilde via GitHub
Herbert Van de Sompel via GitHub
Jakub Klímek via GitHub
Karen Coyle
- Re: Aw: Prof minutes 404 (Friday, 30 August)
- Re: Aw: Prof minutes 404 (Friday, 30 August)
- Prof minutes 404 (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: Agenda for PROF meeting - 26hrs (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: Agenda for PROF meeting - 26hrs (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: Agenda for CNEG Subgroup meeting 2019-08-22 (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Agenda, August 27 (Monday, 26 August)
- Please respond to polls ASAP (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: PROF meeting times - poll (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808) (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: Issue closing procedure (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: PROF mini-meeting in 4 hours (Thursday, 22 August)
- Changed label for PROF (Monday, 19 August)
Karen Coyle via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Saturday, 31 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Thursday, 29 August)
- [dxwg] PROF roles and their definitions (#1049) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine how to reference ResourceRole vocab (#452) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] conformstTo isolated example (#1046) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Web browser navigation of profile information (#239) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] PROF namespace in document (#798) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Sunday, 25 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Saturday, 24 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698) (Saturday, 24 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698) (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Wednesday, 21 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Wednesday, 21 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Wednesday, 21 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Wednesday, 21 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Tuesday, 20 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Tuesday, 20 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Tuesday, 20 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonise Ont/Conneg references and content (#551) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Unfishined renaming of properties in profiles ontology causing loading error (#555) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Jaroslav's profiles ont doc edits (#570) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Better description of application profiles, profiles in general and how they may be used (#659) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify use of dct:conformsTo perhaps with additional properties (#660) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Profiles may be written in or may link to a document or schema in a validation language (ShEx, SHACL, XMLschema). [ID41] (5.41) (#279) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Defining validation (#449) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Friday, 9 August)
Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501) (Friday, 30 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update config.js (Wednesday, 28 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update config.js (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Confused by the eg-ga example (#199) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] CONNEG: Reference to WFS3 (#942) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678) (Friday, 16 August)
- Re: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040) (Monday, 12 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg action 343 (#1026) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287) (Thursday, 1 August)
lars.svensson@web.de
- Aw: Prof minutes 404 (Friday, 30 August)
- Aw: Agenda for CNEG Subgroup meeting 2019-08-29 (Thursday, 29 August)
- Aw: Re: Re: Agenda for CNEG Subgroup meeting 2019-08-22 (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Aw: Re: Agenda for CNEG Subgroup meeting 2019-08-22 (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Agenda for CNEG Subgroup meeting 2019-08-22 (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Fw: Agenda for CNEG Subgroup Meeting 2019-08-22T12:00 (Thursday, 22 August)
- Agenda for CNEG Subgroup Meeting 2019-08-22T12:00 (Thursday, 22 August)
- Fw: Agenda for CNEG Meeting 2019-08-08T12:00:00Z (Thursday, 8 August)
- Agenda for CNEG Meeting 2019-08-08T12:00:00Z (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Fw: Aw: Re: Comments on "Content Negotation by Profile" (30 April) (Monday, 5 August)
- Fw: Agenda for CNEG subgroup telecon 2019-08-01 (Thursday, 1 August)
makxdekkers via GitHub
Nicholas Car
- PROF meeting IRC (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: Agenda for PROF meeting - 26hrs (Thursday, 29 August)
- PROF weekly meetings - Thursdays, 11AM UTC (Wednesday, 28 August)
- FW: PROF weekly meetings - Thursdays, 11AM UTC (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Agenda for PROF meeting - 26hrs (Wednesday, 28 August)
- ODRL use of PROF (Tuesday, 27 August)
- PROF meeting times - poll (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808) (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Issue closing procedure (Thursday, 22 August)
- PROF mini-meeting in 4 hours (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678) (Friday, 16 August)
- Agenda for Conneg teleconference postponed 11 hours (Thursday, 15 August)
Nicholas Car via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Complete Links to Test Suites (#385) (Saturday, 31 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference previous HTTP Accept work (esp JSON-LD) (#382) (Saturday, 31 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698) (Friday, 30 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Unused namspaces in profilescont.ttl (#688) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Unfishined renaming of properties in profiles ontology causing loading error (#555) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Complete CSIRO's profiles implementation description (#408) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Should PROF roles be in a their own namespace? (#1048) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Determine how to reference ResourceRole vocab (#452) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine how to reference ResourceRole vocab (#452) (Thursday, 29 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: conformstTo isolated example (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine which examples of use are to be published in the Profiles Ont doc (#492) (Thursday, 29 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: addressing issues found in Issue 492 (Thursday, 29 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: addressing issues found in Issue 492 (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide an example of both a profile and a resource adhereing to it (#455) (Thursday, 29 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: conformstTo isolated example (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide an example of both a profile and a resource adhereing to it (#455) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Seek a second profiles implementation (#409) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference ADMS (#401) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Complete the information transfer from previous HTML doc (#406) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Complete the information transfer from previous HTML doc (#406) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Query string implementation of profile selection (#544) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Map get resource by profile preferencing from abstract to HTTP & QSA (#591) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Determine responsibilities for listing available profiles when a redirect is used (#603) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Should a server list all profiles it supports, even those in a hierarchy (#932) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] CONNEG: Reference to WFS3 (#942) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Complete CSIRO's profiles implementation description (#408) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] PROF namespace in document (#798) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808) (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Align Alternative Representations Model and PROF (#1041) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Align Alternative Representations Model and PROF (#1041) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] PROF - VOAF alignment (#235) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Confused by the eg-ga example (#199) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate / explain dagram formalisms (#697) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Unused namspaces in profilescont.ttl (#688) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Ambiguous relationship in Figure 1 (#687) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Ambiguity in Abstract and Introduction (#686) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Wednesday, 21 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Tuesday, 20 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Visual clues in Figures 3 and 4 (#689) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Alignment / differentiation with OWL (#696) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Alignment / differentiation with OWL (#696) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Compile PROF implementation evidence (#681) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Compile PROF implementation evidence (#681) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661) (Monday, 19 August)
- [dxwg] Review transitivity intentions & descriptions (#1043) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Clarify use of dct:conformsTo perhaps with additional properties (#660) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify use of dct:conformsTo perhaps with additional properties (#660) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Better description of application profiles, profiles in general and how they may be used (#659) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Better description of application profiles, profiles in general and how they may be used (#659) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Update all example RDF and image files (#658) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Update all example RDF and image files (#658) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Jaroslav's profiles ont doc edits (#570) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Jaroslav's profiles ont doc edits (#570) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Harmonise Ont/Conneg references and content (#551) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonise Ont/Conneg references and content (#551) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Emulate dcat:mediaType instead of dct:format (#519) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Emulate dcat:mediaType instead of dct:format (#519) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] What does prof:profileOf entail? (#507) (Monday, 19 August)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT-Rev profile to simulate 2014/DCAT-AP (#499) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Determine which examples of use are to be published in the Profiles Ont doc (#492) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine which examples of use are to be published in the Profiles Ont doc (#492) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Announce the PROF FPWD via email (#493) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] profile ontology: rdfs:Class vs owl:Class inconsistency between turtle and document (#483) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ont doc Security and Privacy (#479) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Profiles Ont doc Security and Privacy (#479) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Model implementation reporting as done in SHACL (#467) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Model implementation reporting as done in SHACL (#467) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Determine how to reference ResourceRole vocab (#452) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Defining validation (#449) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Seek a second profiles implementation (#409) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Seek a second profiles implementation (#409) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Complete CSIRO's profiles implementation description (#408) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Complete the information transfer from previous HTML doc (#406) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Complete PROF/x alignments (#405) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should be able to indicate which external specifications are expected to be applied/have been applied to values of individual properties [ID43] (5.43) (#280) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may be written in or may link to a document or schema in a validation language (ShEx, SHACL, XMLschema). [ID41] (5.41) (#279) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a data model for representing alternate profiles (#1031) (Friday, 16 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Friday, 16 August)
- Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852) (Friday, 16 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678) (Friday, 16 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine responsibilities for listing available profiles when a redirect is used (#603) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Re: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Map get resource by profile preferencing from abstract to HTTP & QSA (#591) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Antoine's conneg doc edits (#575) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] QSA Profile Conneg realisation must support QSA discovery (#538) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Consider not using _profile QSA key for _profile=list (#589) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Decide on a way of conveying URI / token mappings (#904) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] List profiles for dynamic resources (#785) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Thursday, 15 August)
- [dxwg] Appendix showing an example of of conneg use in DCAT (#1042) (Tuesday, 13 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg action 356 (#1037) (Monday, 12 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg altprofiles model (#1038) (Monday, 12 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Monday, 12 August)
- Re: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040) (Monday, 12 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Align Alternative Representations Model and PROF (#1041) (Monday, 12 August)
- [dxwg] Align Alternative Representations Model and PROF (#1041) (Monday, 12 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg action 356 (#1037) (Monday, 12 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg redefs (Sunday, 11 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg redefs (Sunday, 11 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg altprofiles model (Saturday, 10 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg altprofiles model (Saturday, 10 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg action 356 (Saturday, 10 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg action 356 (Saturday, 10 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg editorial (Friday, 9 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg editorial (Friday, 9 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg profiles appendix (#1030) (Friday, 9 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017) (Thursday, 8 August)
- Re: [dxwg] List profiles for dynamic resources (#785) (Thursday, 8 August)
- Re: [dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852) (Thursday, 8 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025) (Thursday, 8 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025) (Thursday, 8 August)
- Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Thursday, 8 August)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg action 343 (#1026) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a data model for representing alternate profiles (#1031) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- [dxwg] Create a data model for representing alternate profiles (#1031) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN] (#74) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Add an example of a Client/Server scenario demonstrating profile inheritence (#748) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Explore whether list_profiles operation could be provided by an external component (#602) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Explore whether list_profiles operation could be provided by an external component (#602) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Reference previous Alternate Views work (#383) (Tuesday, 6 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg profiles appendix (Tuesday, 6 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg profiles appendix (Tuesday, 6 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Align all Link header requirements & examples (#1027) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Should a server list all profiles it supports, even those in a hierarchy (#932) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Decide on a way of conveying URI / token mappings (#904) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider not using _profile QSA key for _profile=list (#589) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Duplicate Conformance heading (#953) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Duplicate Conformance heading (#953) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Re: [dxwg] QSA Profile Conneg realisation must support QSA discovery (#538) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Refer to OAI-PMH as an implementation of QSA (#516) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Support for existing QSA parameter names (#511) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Align all Link header requirements & examples (#1027) (Thursday, 1 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg action 343 (#1026) (Thursday, 1 August)
Paul Walk via GitHub
pedro winstley
Peter.Winstanley@gov.scot
Philippe Le Hégaret
Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub
Rob Atkinson via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501) (Saturday, 31 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Friday, 30 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Thursday, 29 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290) (Wednesday, 28 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Examine JSON-LD Framing specification for relation to Profiles abstract model (#524) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Sunday, 25 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Sunday, 25 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698) (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788) (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Simplify ontology by remove inverse and transitive properties (#661) (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Wednesday, 21 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Wednesday, 21 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Tuesday, 20 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Monday, 19 August)
- Closed: [dxwg] Profiles may be written in or may link to a document or schema in a validation language (ShEx, SHACL, XMLschema). [ID41] (5.41) (#279) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference PROV (#402) (Sunday, 18 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Should a server list all profiles it supports, even those in a hierarchy (#932) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Thursday, 15 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Appendix showing an example of of conneg use in DCAT (#1042) (Tuesday, 13 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Tuesday, 13 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022) (Monday, 12 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine responsibilities for listing available profiles when a redirect is used (#603) (Monday, 12 August)
- Re: [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040) (Monday, 12 August)
- [dxwg] response header if 303 used (#1040) (Monday, 12 August)
Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Ruben Verborgh via GitHub
Simon Cox via GitHub
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Insert FEATURE AT RISK warnings (Thursday, 22 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Insert FEATURE AT RISK warnings (Thursday, 22 August)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:byteSize - check constraints (#125) (Monday, 12 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025) (Thursday, 8 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Thursday, 8 August)
- Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Thursday, 8 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: dcat-issue-983 - comments -> definitions (Thursday, 8 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: dcat-issue-983 - comments -> definitions (Thursday, 8 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT - Insert missing language tags (Thursday, 8 August)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT - Insert missing language tags (Thursday, 8 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] do we want to use skos:definition or rdfs:comment in the dcat.ttl? (#983) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Features at risk/Implementation evidence (#1025) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Addressing issue #725 - context for scope notes (#1010) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868) (Monday, 5 August)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair (Friday, 2 August)
Stephen Richard via GitHub
tombaker via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698) (Friday, 30 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698) (Friday, 30 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749) (Tuesday, 27 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference DC Singapore Framework (#400) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749) (Monday, 26 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749) (Sunday, 25 August)
- Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486) (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698) (Friday, 23 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384) (Wednesday, 7 August)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference the LDP (#384) (Tuesday, 6 August)
Wouter Beek via GitHub
Last message date: Saturday, 31 August 2019 07:28:46 UTC