W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > August 2019

Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)

From: Karen Coyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:26:42 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-525071741-1566862001-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@aisaac Did you look at the Google doc? There is considerable difference between the Google doc discussion and the 2PWD, and I, for one, (and I believe it is the same for Makx) never signed off on the roles in the 2pwd as being representative of the G-Doc discussion. So I don't know where to take this back up. We could do an issue for each role, but we would still need an issue for the general approach to roles: Which should be included? How much detail should be represented? We could start anew with what's in the 2pwd but it would be quite a loss to not bring along the discussion that took place before and that never achieved consensus.

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/755#issuecomment-525071741 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 26 August 2019 23:26:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:31 UTC