Re: [dxwg] Conneg profiles appendix (#1030)


1. *why arent http and rrd profiles of the abstract model?*
One was a typo, now fixed. The other bypassed since I've removed the Abstract Model profile
2. do we need to muddy the waters by having the abstract a profile of the document
*No, I've removed it*


* *in the figure cnpr:rrd is related to the abstract model and not to "content negotiation by profile"*
Fixed, as per the points made above for Rob
* *I miss the relation between §2.1 and Appendix A.1...*
I've made the RDF match the tabular data from §2.1. Good call by the way! The explanations there were better anyway.
* *I'm not sure what the status of "Example 12"...*
Bypassed by making it something different: a code listing.

GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 9 August 2019 10:52:21 UTC