- From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:52:19 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@rob-metalinkage: 1. *why arent http and rrd profiles of the abstract model?* One was a typo, now fixed. The other bypassed since I've removed the Abstract Model profile 2. do we need to muddy the waters by having the abstract a profile of the document *No, I've removed it* @larsgsvensson: * *in the figure cnpr:rrd is related to the abstract model and not to "content negotiation by profile"* Fixed, as per the points made above for Rob * *I miss the relation between §2.1 and Appendix A.1...* I've made the RDF match the tabular data from §2.1. Good call by the way! The explanations there were better anyway. * *I'm not sure what the status of "Example 12"...* Bypassed by making it something different: a code listing. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1030#issuecomment-519875128 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 9 August 2019 10:52:21 UTC