- From: pedro winstley <pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 17:42:39 +0100
- To: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2019 16:43:15 UTC
agree with @maxdekkers about this Dan Gillman et al in ISO11179 part 4 deal with definitions in helpful ways, and the avoidance of circular reasoning is right in there https://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c035346_ISO_IEC_11179-4_2004(E).zip On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 09:25, makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > Can I again make a comment about circular definitions? Saying that > 'constraints' are 'constraints' or that 'validation' 'provides validation > resource' or that 'mapping' 'provides a mapping' is not really helpful for > someone who does not have the right background. Also, the use of 'provides' > in the definition should be avoided -- it's much better to just state what > it *is* rather than what it *does*. > E.g. > 'constraint': description of obligations, limitations or restrictions that > apply to the profile > 'validation': instructions to be used to verify conformance to the profile > 'mapping': description of conversion between two specifications > > -- > GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers > Please view or discuss this issue at > https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/788#issuecomment-470033551 using your > GitHub account > >
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2019 16:43:15 UTC