- From: Paul Walk via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:56:36 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@nicholascar I have not re-read the PROF Document in full (cannot spare the time right now) but the changes you report above do seem to address my original comments. The issue in this thread broadened slightly to cover the semantics of `dct:standard` (my original comment was not about the semantics of the DC Term). @rob-metalinkage said: > My proposed response to Paul Walk would be "the term Standard derives from the usage in Dublin Core which does not proscribe any specific status, other than some community using it as a reference point." On this point, I agree with @kcoyle 's comment earlier in this thread: > ...there will be folks who do not consider all of their profiles to be "A basis for comparison; a reference point against which other things can be evaluated." In particular, I think that the "against which other things can be evaluated" is something that some folks will not associate with their profiles. -- GitHub Notification of comment by paulwalk Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/792#issuecomment-526500536 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 30 August 2019 07:56:37 UTC