Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)

Its also obvious that the google doc didnt get to, or derive from, a common understanding of the separation of documents from conformance requirements. So lets attack it from the guidance perspective first, then we can make sure that we have the roles and matching descriptions needed to support the suggestions on how to describe profiles with different types of artefacts. The Profiles ontology isnt going to dictate all possible roles and artefact types or usage - only provide a place where they can be discovered. 

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 26 August 2019 23:44:40 UTC