- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:49:26 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@jakubklimek wrote: > @davebrowning Actually, I do not think so. There are still skos:defintions while we agreed to change them to skos:usageNote and skos:scopeNotes. As discussed in the related PR #1010, we have decided to keep the skos:definition when we include the original definitions from third-party vocabularies. See https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1010#issuecomment-519081757. So unless there are some oversights, I think we can close the issue. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/725#issuecomment-519156762 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2019 15:49:28 UTC