w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from January to March 2001 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Saturday, 6 January)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: Latest version of the Infoset (Wednesday, 28 March)

Blair Dillaway

• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Thursday, 22 February)

Brachi, Nigel

• IPR Disclosure (Friday, 2 February)

Brian LaMacchia

• RE: What to do with CryptoBinary? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Sunday, 18 February)
• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Sunday, 28 January)
• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Thursday, 25 January)
• RE: KeyInfo (Monday, 15 January)

Carl Ellison

• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Wednesday, 21 February)

Carl Wallace

• Re: AW: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Wednesday, 24 January)

Christian Geuer-Pollmann

• Question to C14N Implementors abou Validation (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: XPath and Signature ? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• XPath and Signature ? (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: XML-signature & Canonical XML implementations? (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? (Tuesday, 6 February)

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• Re: XML DSIG Questions (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: XML DSIG Questions (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: <Q> Is there a business situation to illustrate this ? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: <Q> XMLDSig and forms... (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: AW: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Draft Comments on Charmod Last Call (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... (Tuesday, 13 February)
• The X509Data Element clarification... (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: RetrievalMethod type question (KeyValue) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: What is the appropriate way to interpret URI's in the XML signed document. (Monday, 12 February)
• RetrievalMethod type question (2nd ping) (Friday, 9 February)
• RetrievalMethod type question (Wednesday, 7 February)
• KeyInfo Extensibility poll results (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Thursday, 25 January)
• KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: XML validation clarification? (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: additional XML Digital Signature clarifications (Monday, 22 January)
• CRL like extensions (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: The changing DSIG name space (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: The changing DSIG name space (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: Moving a Thread to the List: KeyInfo Extensibility (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Saturday, 6 January)

fjh@alum.mit.edu

• signature validation clarification (Sunday, 21 January)

Frederick J. Hirsch

• XML validation clarification? (Sunday, 21 January)
• additional XML Digital Signature clarifications (Sunday, 21 January)

Glenn Adams

• XML DSIG Typo - Section 6.2 (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Wednesday, 28 March)
• X509SKI (Wednesday, 28 March)
• X509IssuerSerial (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: XML DSIG Questions (Monday, 26 March)

Gregor Karlinger

• AW: KeyInfo (Was: Urgent: W3C Guidlines on Namespace structure) (Thursday, 15 March)
• AW: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• AW: AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Thursday, 25 January)
• AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Wednesday, 24 January)
• AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Wednesday, 24 January)
• AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Wednesday, 24 January)

Hans Granqvist

• interoperability efforts? (Thursday, 8 March)

Hiroshi Maruyama

• Re: XML Encryption Data/Processing Model (Friday, 30 March)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-canonical-01.txt (Monday, 22 January)

Jacek Kopecky

• RE: [ANN] W3C SOAP Digital Signature (Wednesday, 21 March)

Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com

• XML-signature & Canonical XML implementations? (Friday, 2 March)

John Boyer

• RE: Infoset: In-scope xml:* attributes (Friday, 30 March)
• RE: XML Encryption Data/Processing Model (Friday, 30 March)
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: Draft Comments on InfoSet (Friday, 16 March)
• RE: Draft Comments on InfoSet (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: XPath and Signature ? (Tuesday, 13 March)
• RE: DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? (Tuesday, 6 February)

Joseph Ashwood

• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Monday, 8 January)
• Problem with canonical form? (Friday, 5 January)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• Fwd: W3C Acknowledged Submission: XML Key Management Specification (XKMS) (Friday, 30 March)
• RE: XML Encryption Data/Processing Model (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Latest version of the Infoset (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: X509SKI (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: What to do with CryptoBinary? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: What to do with CryptoBinary? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: What to do with CryptoBinary? (Monday, 26 March)
• What to do with CryptoBinary? (Monday, 26 March)
• External Attributes in Signature Elements (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: interoperability efforts? (Thursday, 22 March)
• XENC use of ds:KeyInfo (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: AW: KeyInfo (Was: Urgent: W3C Guidlines on Namespace structure) (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Fwd: Canonical XML Version 1.0 Becomes a W3C Recommendation (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: XPath and Signature ? (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: interoperability efforts? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: <Q> Does a signature XML Document need to be a valid XML document ? (Thursday, 8 March)
• KeyInfo: sequence or choice (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Closing Multiple KeyValue (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: empty KeyInfo, etc. (Wednesday, 7 March)
• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Saturday, 24 February)
• xmldsig Infoset Comments (Thursday, 22 February)
• xmldsig Charmod Comments (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Specifications' Status and Tweaked Schema (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Friday, 16 February)
• Draft Comments on InfoSet (Thursday, 15 February)
• Draft Comments on Charmod Last Call (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... (Tuesday, 13 February)
• FYI: Call for Implementation: XML Fragment Interchange (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Friday, 2 February)
• Volunteers for Infoset (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Volunteers for CharModel Review (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Does Shana patent 6,028,938 impact XForms? (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Friday, 26 January)
• C14N Proposed REC (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: The changing DSIG name space (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: The changing DSIG name space (Friday, 19 January)
• FYI: Updated Signature Example (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: KeyInfo (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Moving a Thread to the List: KeyInfo Extensibility (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: KeyInfo (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: The name space URI (Monday, 8 January)
• FYI: SignatureProperty and Signature Semantics (Wednesday, 3 January)

Ken Goldman

• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Monday, 12 March)
• X509SerialNumber schema (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: <Q> Is there a business situation to illustrate this ? (Thursday, 8 March)
• The changing DSIG name space (Thursday, 18 January)

L. Sassaman

• RE: DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? (Tuesday, 6 February)

Martin Duerst

• RE: Latest version of the Infoset (Thursday, 29 March)
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Latest version of the Infoset (Wednesday, 28 March)

Martin J. Duerst

• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Saturday, 6 January)

merlin

• Re: interoperability efforts? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: KeyInfo: sequence or choice (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: interoperability efforts? (Tuesday, 13 March)
• empty KeyInfo, etc. (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: Moving a Thread to the List: KeyInfo Extensibility (Wednesday, 17 January)

Micah Dubinko

• Does Shana patent 6,028,938 impact XForms? (Friday, 26 January)

Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

• RE: What to do with CryptoBinary? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: What to do with CryptoBinary? (Monday, 26 March)

Peter Lipp

• AW: <Q> Does a signature XML Document need to be a valid XML document ? (Tuesday, 13 March)

Petteri Stenius

• RE: The changing DSIG name space (Friday, 19 January)

Philip Hallam-Baker

• XKMS Interest Group / Informal BOF 1st March, Cambridge MA (Tuesday, 13 February)
• DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: The name space URI (Monday, 8 January)
• The name space URI (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: Problem with canonical form? (Monday, 8 January)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: Latest version of the Infoset (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Latest version of the Infoset (Wednesday, 28 March)

RFC Editor

• RFC 3076 on Canonical XML (Thursday, 29 March)
• RFC 3075 on XML-Signature Syntax and Processing (Wednesday, 28 March)

Rich Salz

• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: The changing DSIG name space (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: KeyInfo (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Problem with canonical form? (Friday, 5 January)

Rob Lugt

• Re: Question to C14N Implementors abou Validation (Tuesday, 27 March)

Susan Lesch

• Comments for PR-xml-c14n-20010119 (Monday, 29 January)

TAMURA Kent

• Infoset: In-scope xml:* attributes (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: RetrievalMethod (Monday, 29 January)
• RetrievalMethod (Friday, 26 January)
• Multiple KeyValue (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data (Friday, 26 January)
• Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data (Thursday, 25 January)

The IESG

• Document Action: Canonical XML Version 1.0 to Informational (Friday, 2 February)

Thomas Maslen

• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Friday, 16 March)

Tom Gindin

• Re: X509SerialNumber schema (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data (Tuesday, 30 January)

XML DSig

• <Q> Does a signature XML Document need to be a valid XML document ? (Thursday, 8 March)
• <Q> XMLDSig and forms... (Thursday, 8 March)
• <Q> Is there a business situation to illustrate this ? (Thursday, 8 March)
• What is the appropriate way to interpret URI's in the XML signed document. (Monday, 12 February)

Yongge Wang

• Re: DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? (Tuesday, 6 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2001 19:48:02 UTC