W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Problem with canonical form?

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@caveosystems.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 18:25:21 -0500
Message-ID: <3A5657E0.ED80542@caveosystems.com>
To: Joseph Ashwood <jashwood@arcot.com>
CC: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
No, I think this is another example that points out that the signature often
must cover more than just the XML, but rather the stylesheets, etc., that
are related to it.  I believe the XMLDSIG spec discusses this sufficiently.
	/r$
Received on Friday, 5 January 2001 18:20:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:11 GMT