At 21:52 3/15/2001 +0100, Gregor Karlinger wrote: >o You argue, that you can maintain a defined sequence of the certain > types of children within KeyInfo. But this is only true, as long as > there are used only the predefined types of XML-Signature. The sequence > cannot be maintained any more if there are more than two newly defined > types are used: >o As Merlin argues, it would be sufficient to semantically restrict the > number of occurences for KeyValue to a maximum of one; this would increase > the number of possibilities for reuse of the KeyInfo type by other > parties. Thank you for your responses Gregor and Merlin. We'll leave KeyInfo as a choice (instead of a sequence). __ Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2001 18:18:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:12 GMT