W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: interoperability efforts?

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:53:00 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010308164723.02044d28@rpcp.mit.edu>
To: Hans Granqvist <hgranqvist@verisign.com>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Hans,

Our testing has been relatively informal. There's been some peer exchanges, 
as well as tar balls of examples sent to the list that others run through 
their implementation. This is what we've been doing for the purposes of our 
interoperability report [1] -- which will need to be updated once we move 
Canonical XML to REC because the URI for its algorithm will change. So I'd 
recommend trying the tar ball reference in [1], and if everything goes 
smoothly, feel free to create your own with more exotic/boundary examples.

[1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/17-xmldsig-interop.html

At 11:32 3/8/2001 -0800, Hans Granqvist wrote:
>Is there any ongoing efforts among DSig implementers to
>participate in interoperability tests? We have a full DSig
>implementation and we'd like to see how it stacks up. (If
>you want to try our toolkit, email me for a URL to download
>it.)
>
>I searched both the archives of this list, and the W3C member
>pages, and found nothing mentioning interop (except an IETF
>meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June/July, 2000).
>
>If there is no interop going on, I'd propose we start one.
>Any ideas how to do it 'properly'?
>
>Thanks,
>/Hans
>--
>Hans Granqvist, Verisign XML Web Services, +1 650 429-5369, GMT-8
>
>PS. Can the QA workshop [1] (which mentions conformance testing)
>and its members be part of this?
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/01/qa-ws/


__
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 16:53:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:12 GMT