W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance?

From: Carl Wallace <cwallace@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:49:24 -0500
Message-ID: <001a01c0986a$b6096c00$477c60cf@ornette>
To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Cc: "TAMURA Kent" <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
I vote to limit KeyValue to occurring once and applying to the validation
key.

----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
To: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Cc: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance?


> In [1] Kent asked, "The current specification also permits multiple
KeyValue
> elements in a KeyInfo element.  What does this mean?" Given we've been
> trying to clarify other ambiguities, and with respect to the X509 SKI,
> SubjectName, and IssuerSerial, should we also limit KeyValue to occurring
> once and applying to the validation key, or should we keep the meaning
that
> it's simply a "key that may be useful in validating the signature?"
>
> Please respond by end of Tuesday Feb 20th.
>
>
>
> [1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001JanMar/0052.html
>
> __
> Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
> W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
> IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
> W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
>
>
Received on Friday, 16 February 2001 17:48:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:12 GMT