In message "Re: X509SerialNumber schema" on 01/03/28, "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com> writes: > Given that there are a number of interoperable implementations and > none of the implementors seem to want to change, the specification > should stay the same but I do have some responses to your comments. Right. I don't want to change our implementation and this change might cause performance penalty on Java because Java treats serial numbers as BigInteger instance. -- TAMURA Kent as a developer of IBM XML Security SuiteReceived on Friday, 30 March 2001 04:27:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:12 GMT