W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2009

ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2009 by date

Tuesday, 10 November 2009
- Re: Multi-server HTTP David Morris
- Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Julian Reschke
Monday, 9 November 2009
- Срочно продаю квартиру в центре ivan@w3.org
Saturday, 7 November 2009
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Julian Reschke
Wednesday, 4 November 2009
- RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
Tuesday, 3 November 2009
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
- [Reminder] Review of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Guidelines Francois Daoust
Thursday, 29 October 2009
- Re: wrt HTTP Origin header serialization (was Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin)) Adam Barth
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
- Re: wrt HTTP Origin header serialization (was Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin)) =JeffH
- Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin) =JeffH
- Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin) Julian Reschke
- Re: wrt HTTP Origin header serialization (was Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin)) Adam Barth
- Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin) Adam Barth
Tuesday, 27 October 2009
- wrt HTTP Origin header serialization (was Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin)) =JeffH
- Re: The HTTP Sec-From Header (draft-abarth-origin) =JeffH
- Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Anthony Bryan
- HTTPbis -08 drafts published Julian Reschke
- Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
Monday, 26 October 2009
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-wood-dtnrg-http-dtn-delivery-04.txt Mark Nottingham
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Sunday, 25 October 2009
- Re: Multi-server HTTP Micah Cowan
Saturday, 24 October 2009
- Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Thomas Broyer
- Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Sylvain Hellegouarch
Friday, 23 October 2009
- Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Thomas Broyer
- Nov 2nd - Social Web Camp in Santa Clara Story Henry
- Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis) Sylvain Hellegouarch
Thursday, 22 October 2009
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
- RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
- RE: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Brian Smith
- RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
- Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
- Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Jamie Lokier
Wednesday, 21 October 2009
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Julian Reschke
Tuesday, 20 October 2009
- Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Jim Gettys
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Julian Reschke
- RE: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Brian Smith
- Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Roy T. Fielding
- RE: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Brian Smith
- Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Roy T. Fielding
Monday, 19 October 2009
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
- Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
- Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
- RE: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Brian Smith
- Re: [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Jim Gettys
- Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Julian Reschke
- [OT] Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Lisa Dusseault
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Jim Gettys
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) Adrien de Croy
- Re: #131: Connection limits (proposal) William A. Rowe, Jr.
- #131: Connection limits (proposal) Mark Nottingham
Friday, 16 October 2009
- Issue 123, was: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-00.txt Julian Reschke
- weak etags vs PATCH, was: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Julian Reschke
Thursday, 15 October 2009
- Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt Mark Nottingham
- RE: Which status codes are cacheable? Brian Smith
- Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Anthony Bryan
- Re: Issue 196, was: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries Mark Nottingham
- Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Mark Nottingham
- Re: Issue 188, was: Content/Transfer-Codings organization/IANA considerations (issue 143, 188, 189) Mark Nottingham
- FYI: draft-wing-http-new-tech Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 14 October 2009
- RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Nicolas Alvarez
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Yves Lafon
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Yves Lafon
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham
- #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
- RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Adrien de Croy
- RE: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
- Re: Which status codes are cacheable? Mark Nottingham
- Re: #169: private and no-cache CC directives w/ header args Mark Nottingham
- Re: #173: CR and LF in chunk extension values Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 13 October 2009
- What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
- Which status codes are cacheable? Brian Smith
Monday, 12 October 2009
- Re: cache freshness / age calcs Mark Nottingham
- Re: cache freshness / age calcs Nicolas Alvarez
- cache freshness / age calcs Adrien de Croy
Sunday, 11 October 2009
- Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-05.txt Julian Reschke
Friday, 9 October 2009
- Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
- Re: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update-00 open issues Anthony Bryan
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-wing-behave-http-ip-address-literals-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Thursday, 8 October 2009
- Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Adrien de Croy
- Issue 196, was: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries Julian Reschke
- Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- RE: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Brian Smith
- Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
- Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Yves Lafon
- RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
- Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Mark Nottingham
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
- RE: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Brian Smith
- RE: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Brian Smith
- RE: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Brian Smith
- #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Mark Nottingham
- Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Roy T. Fielding
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
- Re: #184: HTTP/0.9 Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 7 October 2009
- Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Mark Nottingham
- Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Adrien de Croy
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham
- Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Adrien de Croy
- Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- RE: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Brian Smith
- Re: header parsing, trailing OWS David Morris
- Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Proposal: Is OPTIONS Safe? [#171] Julian Reschke
- Re: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke
- Re: #173: CR and LF in chunk extension values Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Julian Reschke
- Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Julian Reschke
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
- draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update-00 open issues Alfred Hönes
Wednesday, 7 October 2009
- Re: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update-00 open issues Anthony Bryan
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
- Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Anthony Bryan
- Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Nicolas Alvarez
- Review of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Guidelines Francois Daoust
- Re: ambiguous ABNF in RFC 2231 (and friends) Julian Reschke
- RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
- Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Julian Reschke
- Re: #167: Content-Location on 304 responses Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#54] 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Mark Nottingham
- Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
- Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
- RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
- Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
- RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
- RE: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Brian Smith
- Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers Mark Nottingham
- Re: #173: CR and LF in chunk extension values Mark Nottingham
- Re: [httpbis] #81: Content Negotiation for media types Mark Nottingham
- Re: Empty host in 'http' scheme [#159] Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Drop Content-Location [#154] Mark Nottingham
- Re: Issue 194: restricting allowed characters in quoted-pair Mark Nottingham
- Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
- Re: Clarifying Content-Location (Issue 136) Mark Nottingham
- Re: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries Mark Nottingham
- Re: ambiguous ABNF in RFC 2231 (and friends) Martin J. Dürst
Monday, 5 October 2009
- ambiguous ABNF in RFC 2231 (and friends) Julian Reschke
Sunday, 4 October 2009
- Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-04.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Anthony Bryan
Saturday, 3 October 2009
- Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-03.txt Julian Reschke
- RE: realms Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
- Re: Multi-server HTTP Sander Steffann
Friday, 2 October 2009
- Re: Multi-server HTTP Anthony Bryan
- Re: CSP spec vs listed-type headers Thomas Broyer
- CSP spec vs listed-type headers Julian Reschke
- RE: Multi-server HTTP Ford, Alan
Thursday, 1 October 2009
- Re: Instance Digests in HTTP (RFC3230) Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Header encoding (per RFC2231), was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Ian Hickson

Last message date: Tuesday, 10 November 2009 23:54:38 GMT
Archived on: Tuesday, 10 November 2009 23:54:48 GMT