On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> That being said, defining this in a spec probably *is* a good idea. Did you >> just volunteer? Note that to produce a spec you actual IETF WG is required. > > ;) No, I wasn't trying to throw myself on that grenade. ;) Not yet at > least. Documenting SOP is a *big* task. I understand why it makes you > worry about slipping deadlines. So, should the charter be revised to > exclude the primary security policy that governs use of HTTP? ;) The same-origin policy is defined here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-abarth-origin AdamReceived on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 20:27:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:13 GMT