On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >>> That being said, defining this in a spec probably *is* a good idea. Did you >>> just volunteer? Note that to produce a spec you actual IETF WG is required. >> >> ;) No, I wasn't trying to throw myself on that grenade. ;) Not yet at >> least. Documenting SOP is a *big* task. I understand why it makes you >> worry about slipping deadlines. So, should the charter be revised to >> exclude the primary security policy that governs use of HTTP? ;) > > The same-origin policy is defined here: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-abarth-origin Actually, that draft is out of date. I've just uploaded a new draft, which I've also attached to this message. Adam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:13 GMT