Julian Reschke wrote: > Mark Nottingham wrote: >> ... >> My .02 - both of these proposed requirements are quite vague and can't >> be tested. I'd put forth that client authors know full well whether >> they're being abusive, and a few sentences in HTTP isn't going to >> convince them not to be. At the most, we might add something like >> >> """ >> Note that servers might reject traffic that they deem abusive, >> including an excessive number of connections from a client. >> "" >> ... > > OK, proposed patch: > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/131/131.diff> > ... Applied with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/715>. BR, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 15:56:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:12 GMT