Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses

Yep.

On 08/10/2009, at 1:20 PM, Brian Smith wrote:

> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> This was discussed both on-list and in Stockholm; AIUI the current
>> proposal is:
>>
>> 1) caches MUST strip the Content-MD5 header when combining 206
>> responses, and
>> 2) origin servers MUST NOT send a Content-MD5 header on 206 responses
>
> Clients also MUST strip/ignore the Content-MD5 header on 206  
> responses.
> The whole point is that the combination of 206 responses and Content- 
> MD5
> is not reliable, right?
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 02:49:52 UTC