W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC2616 vs draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth

From: Paul C. Bryan <email@pbryan.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:07:05 +0000
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>, "HTTP Working Group (ietf-http-wg@w3.org)" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1259910367.6142.556.camel@localhost>
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 20:12 -0700, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:

> The OAuth working group is working to define a new HTTP authentication
> scheme. This requires referencing either RFC 2617 or
> draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth. The goal is to move the spec into last
> call in 3-6 months.
> 
> Which ABNF and reference should the new work use?

I lean toward draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth, for AFAIK, OAuth will only use
the response status codes and headers, and nothing related to basic or
digest authentication in particular.

Paul

> 
> EHL
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 10:31:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:13 GMT