W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions

From: Kris Zyp <kris@sitepen.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:34:51 -0700
Message-ID: <4B0D5CAB.5060909@sitepen.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 


Julian Reschke wrote:
> Kris Zyp wrote:
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>> We'll also need to determine what the requirements for
>>>> registration are (standards-track?), and set up the registry.
>>>>
>>> For now we haven't defined a registry (I think the idea was to
>>> wait for the first use case to come up and then discuss again).
>>>
>> So if I wanted to submit a request to register "items" as a range
>> unit extension per the discussion in this thread ([1] for
>> reference), is there a way I could that?
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/re6oo4hq3wvt6qhn ...
>
> The short answer I think is: not right now.
>
> But even if HTTPbis *did* have the registry now, using it would
> block publication until HTTPbis is ready as well. Would that be
> acceptable?
Thats fine, I am in no hurry. We'll just plan on registering it at
some point in the future when everything is ready.
Thanks,

- --
Kris Zyp
SitePen
(503) 806-1841
http://sitepen.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
iEYEARECAAYFAksNXKsACgkQ9VpNnHc4zAwc4ACePFP+HeIH3Qxs9JLI2ZIthchg
7SUAn2TYkdur4tQd6IW03g9FLNKxwwYk
=sZUb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 16:35:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:13 GMT