- From: Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:18:39 +1100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>, Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>, Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > On 16/09/2009, at 7:46 PM, Sam Johnston wrote: >> Would it be possible then to support multiple references so that people >> can see at a glance that a given relation is implemented as described in >> multiple formats (rather than just the first format that happened to >> register it)? May well not be worth the maintenance effort. > > How about adding a new field for references to more information about how a > relation is used in a particular context (scoped by context media type)? > > E.g., > > References regarding use in specific contexts: > text/html: [HTML5] > application/atom+xml: [RFC4287] > Yes, that sounds like a great idea. And vaguely familiar: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2009JulSep/0699.html Thanks, -joe
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 06:19:14 UTC