W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Input on request for link relation

From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:20:31 -0500
To: Bill de hOra <bill@dehora.net>
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>, Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org, Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
Message-ID: <OF3FD2D0B6.6C34FBDB-ON8525766C.0080186C-8525766C.0080396C@us.ibm.com>
> IOW allow the link registry to define rel scopes. The url or clash thing 

> sucks and I don't want someone rolling up with a curies/qnames or some 
> other XML macrocrap proposal for Atom.

Yeah, it would be a huge mistake to use something that's pretty much 
already guaranteed to be part of your Atom infrastructure.  Far better to 
create yet another distributed naming scheme.



STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:21:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 1 October 2015 05:36:37 UTC