Sunday, 30 December 2001
Friday, 28 December 2001
Thursday, 27 December 2001
- RE: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization
- RE: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization
Wednesday, 26 December 2001
Saturday, 22 December 2001
Friday, 21 December 2001
- Re: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization
- Re: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: Media type encoding parameter?
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: Media type encoding parameter?
- Media type encoding parameter?
- RE: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
Thursday, 20 December 2001
- RE: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- RE: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- Multicast MEP and multiple body actors
- Re: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization
- RE: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- RE: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- RE: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: Two issues to be opened relating to my rewrite for Issue 101 (and one more already resolved)
- Re: maxOccurs="1" for header and body?
- maxOccurs="1" for header and body?
- Re: Issue #97 closed
- Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Issue #97 closed
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (fwd)
- Re: Two issues to be opened relating to my rewrite for Issue 101 (and one more already resolved)
- RE: NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Closing issue 171
Wednesday, 19 December 2001
- Minutes of 12 December 2001
- Re: ETF: Issue 47 (SOAP Data Model)
- Re: ETF: Issue 47 (SOAP Data Model)
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (fwd)
- Re: Encoding: multistructs, generic compound types
- Re: ETF: Issue 47 (SOAP Data Model)
- Re: Encoding: multistructs, generic compound types
Tuesday, 18 December 2001
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd)
- RE: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (fwd)
- Publication of SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0: Primer, SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework, SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts and XML Protocol Usage Scenarios as W3C Working Drafts
- Test Assertion Subgroup 1
- Re: Encoding: multistructs, generic compound types
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (fwd)
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (fwd)
- Minutes of 5 dec 2001 teleconference
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (fwd)
- Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- proposal for issue 164: describing arrays in XML Schema
- Multistructs - why not.
- Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types
Monday, 17 December 2001
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (fwd)
- RE: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- RE: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- RE: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- Re: SOAP IANA considerations
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (fwd)
- NameValue and NameValueList data types
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Enco ding
- Test cases for SOAP 1.2 Part 2 Section 5
Sunday, 16 December 2001
Saturday, 15 December 2001
- Re: document vs rpc
- Two issues to be opened relating to my rewrite for Issue 101 (and one more already resolved)
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- document vs rpc
Friday, 14 December 2001
- Re: [soapbuilders] FEEDBACK REQUESTED - Issues regarding Array encoding for SOAP 1.2
- Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- RE : Issue 171. Revised text to close issue
Thursday, 13 December 2001
- Re: Feedback on arrays
- RE: [soapbuilders] FEEDBACK REQUESTED - Issues regarding Array encoding for SOAP 1.2
- Feedback on arrays
- Feedback
- Re: [soapbuilders] FEEDBACK REQUESTED - Issues regarding Array encoding for SOAP 1.2
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: [SOAP Encoding Issue] Most to least specific encodingStyles,HOW?
- Re: [soapbuilders] FEEDBACK REQUESTED - Issues regarding Array encoding for SOAP 1.2
- RE: [soapbuilders] FEEDBACK REQUESTED - Issues regarding Array encoding for SOAP 1.2
- RE: [soapbuilders] FEEDBACK REQUESTED - Issues regarding Array encoding for SOAP 1.2
- FW: [soapbuilders] FEEDBACK REQUESTED - Issues regarding Array en coding for SOAP 1.2
- Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- RE: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: XMLE Review: xmlp wg comments to XMLE/Canonicalization WDs
Wednesday, 12 December 2001
- Re: XMLE Review: xmlp wg comments to XMLE/Canonicalization WDs
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Last Call XMLP comments to XMLE: expires Friday Dec 14th
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- issue 59: mandating character encoding - seeking clarification
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: ETF: Issue 47 (SOAP Data Model)
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
Tuesday, 11 December 2001
- RE: issue #159 resolution addendum
- Re: ETF: Issue 47 (SOAP Data Model)
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (fwd)
- Re: part 2/sec 6
- Re: issue #159 resolution addendum
- soap-envelope schema
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
Monday, 10 December 2001
- Re: part 2/sec 6
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: Encoding: encodingStyle issues
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- RE: part 2/sec 6
- RE: XMLE Review: xmlp wg comments to XMLE/Canonicalization WDs
- RE: Encoding: mandate validation of XML Schema simple types?
- Re: part 2/sec 6
- Re: Encoding: mandate validation of XML Schema simple types?
- RE: Encoding: mandate validation of XML Schema simple types?
Sunday, 9 December 2001
- Re: Encoding: encodingStyle issues
- Encoding test case template
- Encoding: encodingStyle issues
- Encoding: mandate validation of XML Schema simple types?
- issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding
- Encoding: multistructs, generic compound types
Friday, 7 December 2001
- Test collection as part of group 2 efforts on Section 4
- RE: Updated SOAP Protocol Binding Framework
- Re: Updated SOAP Protocol Binding Framework
- XMLE Review: xmlp wg comments to XMLE/Canonicalization WDs
- part 2/sec 6
- RE: SOAP IANA considerations
- Re: Updated SOAP Protocol Binding Framework
- Re: SOAP IANA considerations
- Re: SOAP IANA considerations
Thursday, 6 December 2001
- RE: [Fwd: Business Case for using SOAP]
- Re: SOAP IANA considerations
- RE: SOAP IANA considerations
- Re: SOAP IANA considerations
- Re: Section 5 vs Schema
- Re: SOAP IANA considerations
- Re: SOAP IANA considerations
- possible new editorial issues
- Re: SOAP IANA considerations
- SOAP IANA considerations
- Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- Re: [Fwd: Business Case for using SOAP]
- Re: TBTF pieces for the specs
Wednesday, 5 December 2001
- Issue on TBTF introductory text
- email for proposed closing of issue #21
- Re: TBTF pieces for the specs
- RE: Proposed text for XML Base support in SOAP 1.2
- Re: TBTF pieces for the specs
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Proposed text for issue 155
- Re: TBTF pieces for the specs
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Proposed text for XML Base support in SOAP 1.2
- RE: Proposed text for issue 155
- RE: Proposed text for issue 155
- RE: Proposed text for XML Base support in SOAP 1.2
- Re: Proposed text for XML Base support in SOAP 1.2
- Re: Proposed text for XML Base support in SOAP 1.2
- RE: Proposed text for XML Base support in SOAP 1.2
- Re: Proposed text for XML Base support in SOAP 1.2
- RE: [Fwd: Business Case for using SOAP]
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinctio n.
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinction.
- Re: SOAP and dynamic structures
- Re: Proposed text for issue 155
- Re: Proposed text for issue 155
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinction.
- Re: Proposed text for issue 155
- Re: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- SOAP Message Path & Transport Binding Standard Features - initial list
Tuesday, 4 December 2001
- Re: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Proposed text for issue 155
- Re: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Proposed text for issue 155
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinction.
- Re: Proposed text for issue 155
- Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks
- Re: [Fwd: Business Case for using SOAP]
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinctio n.
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Section 5 vs Schema
- TBTF pieces for the specs
- [Fwd: Business Case for using SOAP]
- Re: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinctio n.
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinctio n.
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- RE: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinctio n.
- RE: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinctio n.
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- RE: Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Transport Binding Reviews
- Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- RE: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinctio n.
- Possible new issue on interpretation of relative URI actors
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinction.
- regrets for 12/5-
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinctio n.
- RE: Comments on Message Exchange Pattern: Single Request-Response document
- Re: Comments on SOAP Protocol Binding Framework
- RE: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinctio n.
- Comments on Message Exchange Pattern: Single Request-Response document
- Re: Transport Binding Reviews
- Comments on SOAP Protocol Binding Framework
- Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- Re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinction.
- Re: Suggestion on application/soap{+xml} media type attribute
- Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- Comments on the HTTP binding
- re: Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinction.
Monday, 3 December 2001
- Re: Suggestion on application/soap{+xml} media type attribute
- Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- Proposed Edits to "Framework" spec for header/body distinction.
- Closing issue 138
- RE: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- RE: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- Re: i154: are roles invariant?
- RE: i154: are roles invariant?
- Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- Section 5 vs Schema
- RE: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- RE: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- Re: Suggestion on application/soap{+xml} media type attribute
- Preparing for application/xml
- Re: Suggestion on application/soap{+xml} media type attribute
- Re: Suggestion on application/soap{+xml} media type attribute
- Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data
- RE: i154: are roles invariant?
- RE: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review
- RE: i154: are roles invariant?
- RE: Suggestion on application/soap{+xml} media type attribute
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review
- RE: Suggestion on application/soap{+xml} media type attribute
- Proposed text for XML Base support in SOAP 1.2
- Updated SOAP Protocol Binding Framework
- Re: Suggestion on application/soap{+xml} media type attribute