- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:22:24 -0500
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "'Jacek Kopecky'" <jacek@systinet.com>, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1 Williams, Stuart wrote: > Dug, > > A picky catch on the last sentence (which I know originates from the > previous text): > > >>The actor attribute information item is to be used to indicate the >>SOAP node at which a particular SOAP header block is targeted. >> > > Values carried in actor attribute information item denote 'roles', not SOAP > Nodes directly. We might want to be clearer about that. > > Stuart > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jacek Kopecky [mailto:jacek@systinet.com] >>Sent: 04 December 2001 22:03 >>To: Doug Davis >>Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org >>Subject: Re: Proposed text for issue 155 >> >> >>+1. 8-) >> >> Jacek Kopecky >> >> Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) >> http://www.systinet.com/ >> >> >> >>On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Doug Davis wrote: >> >> > oh, geez, no - I see how it can be taken that way, how about: >> > >> > As described in 2 SOAP Message Exchange Model, not all parts of a >> > SOAP message may be intented for the ultimate SOAP receiver. The >> > actor attribute information item is to be used to indicate the >> > SOAP node at which a particular SOAP header block is targeted. >> > >> > -Dug >> > >> > >> > Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com> on 12/04/2001 02:45:03 PM >> > >> > To: Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS >> > cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org> >> > Subject: Re: Proposed text for issue 155 >> > >> > >> > >> > Dug, >> > just a question for clarification: >> > Are you proposing here that the absence of the actor attribute >> > equals the proposed semantics of the ".../any" actor? >> > >> > Jacek Kopecky >> > >> > Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) >> > http://www.systinet.com/ >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Doug Davis wrote: >> > >> > > Section 4.2.2 states: >> > > As described in 2 SOAP Message Exchange Model, not >>all parts of a >> > > SOAP message may be intended for the ultimate SOAP >>receiver. SOAP >> > > defines an actor attribute information item that can >>be used to >> > > indicate the SOAP node at which a particular SOAP >>header block is >> > > targeted. >> > > >> > > I propose to change this to: >> > > As described in 2 SOAP Message Exchange Model, not >>all parts of a >> > > SOAP message may be intented for the ultimate SOAP >>receiver. The >> > > actor attribute information item is to be used to indicate the >> > > SOAP node at which a particular SOAP header block is >>targeted if >> > > targeting of that header block is desired. >> > > >> > > Note 1: The "2" is a typo in the version of the spec I have :-) >> > > Note 2: This entire piece of text might be removed when issues >> > > 153 and 160 are resolved. >> > > >> > > -Dug >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2001 13:26:38 UTC