- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 07:35:27 -0500
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Just a few comments... ---- The definition of features should be moved outside of this document and into the spec itself. To have features mentioned only w.r.t. bindings and then to say features could include things like "correlation" which might not have anything to do with bindings could lead people to assume a link between the two that does not need to exists. Features (or as I prefer them to be called "extensions") are not necessarily related to the binding (could be - but not required). ---- "It is up to the communicating nodes to decide how best to express particular features". This isn't correct - the binding specification decides how best to express the features - the communicating nodes decide which binding to use - but once the binding is picked the nodes are not free to express features in some random fashion. ---- -Dug
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2001 07:35:34 UTC