- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:29:13 +0100 (CET)
- To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- cc: <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Noah, I don't like the last part. The issue arose because SOAP Encoding requires all the values to be typed and it was not clear what the types of externally referenced data were. Now you're proposing "untyped" values. If we want to go that way, I think we don't need any text like the one below, we'd just need to relax the requirement on values being typed. See terminology bullet #1 and rule bullets #2 and #3 in Part 2, section 4.1 [1]. Regards, Jacek Kopecky Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) http://www.systinet.com/ [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/08/29/soap12-part2.html#encrules On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > Proposed further clarifications set off in >> ..<<: > > "This specification does not constrain the type of resource that can be > referenced through the <att>href</att> attribute information item. In the > case > of an XML resource, the type MAY be defined by the <att>xsi:type</att> > attribute information item >>on the referenced resource<< or by an > associated > XML Schema >>(note, however that schema validation of referenced resources > is > OPTIONAL)<<. For non-XML resources, other typing means >>MAY<< be used, > although the specification of such typing means is outside the scope of > this > specification. >>When no such type information is available, the > referenced > resource is considered to be 'untyped'.<<" > > I'm not 100% comfortable with the last part, but if we're mapping from > serializations to graphs, and if graph nodes are generally typed, we have > to say something about the interpretation in the case where no type > information is available. I'm more or less convinced that the other > changes proposed above are desireable. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 > Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr> > Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org > 12/20/01 07:51 AM > > > To: "Champion Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com> > cc: xml-dist-app <xml-dist-app@w3.org> > Subject: Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng > (fwd) > > > Mike, thanks for your input. I would suggest further amendments to your > text, > and in particular removing the second sentence since typing information > may be > provided outside the target resource, for example directly within the SOAP > enveloppe, even for non-XML resources albeit in a non-standard fashion: > > "This specification does not constrain the type of resource that can be > referenced through the <att>href</att> attribute information item. In the > case > of an XML resource, the type MAY be defined by the <att>xsi:type</att> > attribute information item or by an associated XML Schema. For non-XML > resources, other typing means need to be used, although the specification > of > such typing means is outside the scope of this specification." > > Jean-Jacques. > > "Champion, Mike" wrote: > > > Here's a quick attempt at translating it into spec-ese: > > > > "The SOAP 1.2 specification does not constrain the type of resource > > referenced by the href attribute. It is the responsibility of the target > > resource to define any type information. In the case of XML, the type > can > > be defined by an XML schema associated with the target resource, or by > the > > xsi:type information item. For non-XML target resources, other means to > > define the type will have to be provided outside the SOAP framework." > > > > Use, revise, or ignore as you see fit ... > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2001 12:36:57 UTC