- From: Matt Long <mlong@phalanxsys.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:12:57 -0600
- To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Jacek, What is the your position for not validating XSD intrinsic types? Thx, -Matt W. Matthew Long Phalanx Systems, LLC Creating the Future Now... Telephone: 901-861-1134 Toll Free: 888-204-1757 Email: mlong@phalanxsys.com > -----Original Message----- > From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 1:17 PM > To: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: Encoding: mandate validation of XML Schema simple types? > > > Hi all. 8-) > During the F2F test cases generation, Noah said he felt our spec > should mandate validating the XML Schema built-in simple types > (those listed in the XML Schema - Datatypes spec). > I thought that this was unnecessary. What do others think? > If we decide SOAP Encoding processors MUST validate XML Schema > simple types, we'll need a new SOAP Encoding fault code, for > example enc:InvalidData to cover faulting. > Best regards > > Jacek Kopecky > > Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) > http://www.systinet.com/ > >
Received on Sunday, 9 December 2001 22:14:46 UTC