> The problem we (as an industry) have is that until we standardize the > representation of a name-value list, we will never achieve any true > interoperability of such a fundamental programming language construct as > name-value pairs. An "Apache standard" for this type representation is not > going to provide this The success of Apache as a de-facto standard argues strongly otherwise. I don't see a compelling reason to define anything beyond the schema base types, and constructors. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures, Encryption) http://www.zolera.comReceived on Thursday, 20 December 2001 09:05:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:43 UTC