Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types

> The problem we (as an industry) have is that until we standardize the
> representation of a name-value list, we will never achieve any true
> interoperability of such a fundamental programming language construct as
> name-value pairs.  An "Apache standard" for this type representation is not
> going to provide this

The success of Apache as a de-facto standard argues strongly otherwise.

I don't see a compelling reason to define anything beyond the schema
base types, and constructors.
	/r$
-- 

Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,
Encryption)
http://www.zolera.com