- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:53:02 -0800
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I'd like to gather comments from xmlp members for the XMLE[1] and canonicalization WD[2] My comments from July[3], and I believe are still not addressed. My comments are around the usage scenarios of SOAP with XMLE, and the processing model under validation and transformation. Because XMLE provides a schema, it presumably must be used by an XML Schema validator. But there is no treatment for how a document author of the unencrypted content or schema should use the XMLE schema - especially given that XMLE content will be inside SOAP elements. In general, my comments are not SOAP specific. The same questions arise when retrieving a document with XMLE content whether it be SOAP or foo encoded. I suggest that the XMLE group should provide documentation that describes the expected processing and validation model for documents containing XMLE content. While section 4 of [1] describes detailed element processing, perhaps a new section describing message/document processing would be useful, eg. "4.4 Complete message processing model". I'm not sure whether it should be normative or non-normative, though I lean to non-normative. Perhaps another option - though I'm not in favour of it - would be to have a separate document published by XMLE on the topic. If it is true that encyrption of portions of SOAP messgaes are a primary justification for XMLE then it seems fairly important to have at least described the overall processing model and how it works for SOAP messages. I suggest that treatment of an enrypted and/or signed SOAP header would be a sufficient usage scenario that would satisfy other non-soap applications. This would certainly help for groups that have publicly stated intensions of use SOAP and XMLE, such as OASIS SAML. Cheers, Dave [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2001OctDec/0014.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2001OctDec/0034.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Jul/0019.html
Received on Friday, 7 December 2001 15:55:51 UTC