Antwort: Re: Fwd: logics of RDF
Regrets 1/31
Re: Antwort: Re: Fwd: logics of RDF
Minutes of 1/31 telecon
joining telecon only now -- apologies
Requirement Document
UPDATE: document on layering OWL on top of RDF
ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics -- 1/31 Telecon
Possible OWL trademark problem?
ADMIN: Next Face to Face meetings
evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements
- Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements
- Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements
- Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements (done)
REQDOC: Use Case Action Items
ORGANIZATION: Important announcement - new cochair!
ADMIN: scribe notes from 24 Jan telecon
RE: REQDOC: Use Case - Corporate Landfill
CALL FOR PAPERS and PARTICIPATION: Business Agents and the Semant ic Web (BASeWEB)
RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents
Fwd: Re: CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
ADMIN: T-shirts
REQDOC: NEED INPUT!
24/1 Telecon Regrets
24/1 Telecon Regrets
COLLECT: f2f presentation
Fwd: Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics -- 1/24 Telecon
photos from the webont f2f
ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics -- 1/24 Telecon
[Fwd: [Fwd: Possible OWL trademark problem?]]
defaults
Why do we need reasoning services?
- Re: Why do we need reasoning services?
- Re: Why do we need reasoning services?
- Re: Why do we need reasoning services?
Actions/Minutes NJ ftf for review
Possible OWL trademark problem?
Original Slides from General Requirements Group
Patel-Schneider Paradox ...
antifoundation, flat, wellfounded
REQDOC: The WebOnt Requirements Document
requirements/goals presentation
the decision stuff requirement
F2F: The requirements vote
ADMIN: Telecon - none this week
Web Logs
Ontology Versioning System
DAML+OIL Technical Detail by Ian Horrocks
SERVICES: F2F Requirements Submission: Requirements part
SERVICES: F2F Requirements Submission
ISWC 2002 2nd and Final Call for Papers
ADMIN: f2f reading list
ADMIN: No WOWG telecon 1/10
face-to-face: data projector
Fwd: Re: OWL by name...
INTEROPERABILITY: new member
RE: admin: face-to-face banquet- Regrets
admin: face-to-face banquet
Face-to-face: DAML+OIL Issues and Experiences
Face-to-face: COLLECT use cases
Face-to-face: Content Interoperability Use Case final draft
1/3 Regrets
1/3 Telecon Regrets
Face-to-Face: General Requirements Reading
face-to-face: Final version of documents, reading list, and presentation outline for OWL presentation at face-to-face
RE: NAME: SWOL versus WOL
missing information re banquet
Face-to-Face: Reading and Outline for "SWOL Discussion"
Face-to-Face: Reading and Outline for "DAML+OIL Technical Detail"
A wishlist for orthodox christmas OR some DAML+OIL experiences
Minutes 3rd January 2002
How to layer the semantic web properly (the missing attachment)
How to layer the semantic web properly?
- The status of the RDF MT (was: Re: How to layer the semantic web properly?)
- Re: How to layer the semantic web properly?
Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
URL for Pat's Model Theory.
Model Theory
wired network for f2f
f2f attendee list
Layering on the Semantic Web
Introduction : Laurent OLIVRY
Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)
- Re: Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)
- Re: Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)-Late attendance
- Re: Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)-Late attendance
- RE: Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)
- Re: Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)