Friday, 1 February 2002
Thursday, 31 January 2002
- Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics -- 1/31 Telecon
- Re: Regrets 1/31
- Antwort: Re: Fwd: logics of RDF
- Regrets 1/31
- Re: Antwort: Re: Fwd: logics of RDF
- Minutes of 1/31 telecon
- Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics -- 1/31 Telecon
- joining telecon only now -- apologies
- Re: Requirement Document
- Requirement Document
- Re: ADMIN: Next Face to Face meetings
- Re: ADMIN: Next Face to Face meetings
- UPDATE: document on layering OWL on top of RDF
- Re: ADMIN: Next Face to Face meetings
- ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics -- 1/31 Telecon
Wednesday, 30 January 2002
- Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements (done)
- Re: REQDOC: Use Case Action Items
- Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements
- Re: ADMIN: Next Face to Face meetings
- Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements
- Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements
- Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements
- Possible OWL trademark problem?
- Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements
- ADMIN: Next Face to Face meetings
- evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements
Tuesday, 29 January 2002
- REQDOC: Use Case Action Items
- ORGANIZATION: Important announcement - new cochair!
- ADMIN: scribe notes from 24 Jan telecon
Monday, 28 January 2002
Friday, 25 January 2002
- RE: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents
- CALL FOR PAPERS and PARTICIPATION: Business Agents and the Semant ic Web (BASeWEB)
- RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents
- Fwd: Re: CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
- Re: CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
- Re: CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
- Re: CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
- Re: CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
- Re: CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
- Re: CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
- CHAIR-NOTE: Defaults and etc.
Thursday, 24 January 2002
- ADMIN: T-shirts
- Re: REQDOC: NEED INPUT! - [Content Interoperability]
- Re: REQDOC: NEED INPUT!
- RE: 24/1 Telecon Regrets
- REQDOC: NEED INPUT!
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- 24/1 Telecon Regrets
- 24/1 Telecon Regrets
- COLLECT: f2f presentation
- Re: Fwd: Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics -- 1/24 Telecon
Wednesday, 23 January 2002
- Fwd: Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics -- 1/24 Telecon
- ADMIN: IP Issue
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- photos from the webont f2f
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics -- 1/24 Telecon
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
Tuesday, 22 January 2002
- [Fwd: [Fwd: Possible OWL trademark problem?]]
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- reasoning about documents/ontologies? [was: defaults]
- Re: defaults
- RE: defaults
- RE: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- RE: defaults
- Re: Possible OWL trademark problem?
- Re: defaults
- Re: defaults
- Re: Patel-Schneider Paradox ...
- Re: defaults
Monday, 21 January 2002
Saturday, 19 January 2002
Sunday, 20 January 2002
- Re: Why do we need reasoning services?
- Re: Why do we need reasoning services?
- Re: Why do we need reasoning services?
Saturday, 19 January 2002
Friday, 18 January 2002
- Re: Patel-Schneider Paradox ...
- Re: Patel-Schneider Paradox ...
- Re: F2F: The requirements vote
- Re: Possible OWL trademark problem?
- Actions/Minutes NJ ftf for review
- Possible OWL trademark problem?
- Re: How to layer the semantic web properly?
- Re: Original Slides from General Requirements Group
- layering (was Re: Patel-Schneider Paradox ...)
Saturday, 19 January 2002
Friday, 18 January 2002
- Re: F2F: The requirements vote
- Original Slides from General Requirements Group
- Re: Patel-Schneider Paradox ...
- Re: antifoundation, flat, wellfounded
Saturday, 19 January 2002
Friday, 18 January 2002
Thursday, 17 January 2002
Wednesday, 16 January 2002
- requirements/goals presentation
- the decision stuff requirement
- Re: F2F: The requirements vote
- F2F: The requirements vote
Tuesday, 15 January 2002
Monday, 14 January 2002
Sunday, 13 January 2002
- The status of the RDF MT (was: Re: How to layer the semantic web properly?)
- SERVICES: F2F Requirements Submission: Requirements part
- SERVICES: F2F Requirements Submission
Friday, 11 January 2002
Wednesday, 9 January 2002
- Re: Face-to-face: COLLECT use cases
- ADMIN: f2f reading list
- ADMIN: No WOWG telecon 1/10
- face-to-face: data projector
- Re: Face-to-face: COLLECT use cases
- Fwd: Re: OWL by name...
Tuesday, 8 January 2002
- INTEROPERABILITY: new member
- RE: admin: face-to-face banquet- Regrets
- Admin: face-to-face: transportation to Murray Hill Inn
- admin: face-to-face banquet
- Face-to-face: DAML+OIL Issues and Experiences
Monday, 7 January 2002
- Face-to-face: COLLECT use cases
- Reading list, ftf page [was: face-to-face: Final version of documents...]
- Face-to-face: Content Interoperability Use Case final draft
- 1/3 Regrets
- 1/3 Telecon Regrets
- RE: Face-to-Face: General Requirements Reading
- Face-to-Face: General Requirements Reading
- face-to-face: Final version of documents, reading list, and presentation outline for OWL presentation at face-to-face
- Re: P.S. Re: Model Theory
- Re: P.S. Re: Model Theory
- Re: P.S. Re: Model Theory
- Re: P.S. Re: Model Theory
- Re: P.S. Re: Model Theory
Sunday, 6 January 2002
Saturday, 5 January 2002
- RE: NAME: SWOL versus WOL
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- RE: NAME: SWOL versus WOL
Friday, 4 January 2002
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Face-to-Face: Reading and Outline for "SWOL Discussion"
- missing information re banquet
- Face-to-Face: Reading and Outline for "SWOL Discussion"
- Face-to-Face: Reading and Outline for "DAML+OIL Technical Detail"
- A wishlist for orthodox christmas OR some DAML+OIL experiences
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Minutes 3rd January 2002
- Re: Layering on the Semantic Web
- Minutes 3rd January 2002
- Re: Layering on the Semantic Web
- Re: Peter's example
- How to layer the semantic web properly (the missing attachment)
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Peter's example
- How to layer the semantic web properly?
- Re: Peter's example
Thursday, 3 January 2002
- Re: Peter's example
- Re: Model Theory
- Peter's example
- Re: Model Theory
- Re: P.S. Re: Model Theory
- Re: Model Theory
- Re: Layering on the Semantic Web
- Re: Model Theory
- P.S. Re: Model Theory
- URL for Pat's Model Theory.
- Model Theory
- wired network for f2f
- Re: Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)
- f2f attendee list
- Re: Layering on the Semantic Web
- RE: Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)
- Re: How to capture modeling information in WOL
- Re: Layering on the Semantic Web
- Re: Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)-Late attendance
- Re: Agenda/Logistics - telecon 1/3 (All hands)-Late attendance
- Layering on the Semantic Web
- Introduction : Laurent OLIVRY