Re: Peter's example

From: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Subject: Re: Peter's example
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 00:10:21 +0100

> > A couple of points with respect to the owl rules and euler.
> >
> > 1/ Where is the formal specification of what Euler is doing?  I'm trying to
> >    figure it out by example, but a formal spec is needed.
> 
> that is indeed very needed, but for the moment we don't have one...

The reason I ask is that you have what appear to be constructors in the
right hand side of rule, and I was wondering what their meaning was.

peter

Received on Saturday, 5 January 2002 08:12:00 UTC