Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements (done)

On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 18:11, Dan Connolly wrote:
> Ian, Dean,
> 
> I got thru the A requirements today,
> and I've sketched the rest.
> 
>   An evaluation of DAML+OIL w.r.t. WebOnt candidate requirements
>   DRAFT $Revision: 1.6 $ of $Date: 2002/01/30 00:08:08 $
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/reqdo.html
> 
> 
> Please start reviewing the A stuff
> while I work on the rest tomorrow.
> 
> Other folks in the WG: you can comment now or
> you can wait 'till we're finished.

I think it's done now. Ian and Dean have looked at it
and mostly agreed with it. They have little issues here
and there, but I'm sure lots of other folks will too,
so for now, I'm going to claim victory.

Please take a look. v1.7

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 18:06:54 UTC