- From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 18:28:04 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
In an off-line email message, Jim wrote: > I'm curious about losing RDF-schema compatibility, of all of them, that seems > like the simplest to preserve (esp. as we can still influence > rdf-schema if minor changes to it fix this) Two reasons for only partial compatability: - syntactic: we're not sure if we can organise the XML syntax to "include" a/some/all of the RDF Schema serialisations. - semantic: as you know, the RDF Schema model contains some oddities (classes as members of classes, etc). We might want to make the OWL meta-model simpler. Frank. ----
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 12:28:50 UTC