In an off-line email message, Jim wrote: > I'm curious about losing RDF-schema compatibility, of all of them, that seems > like the simplest to preserve (esp. as we can still influence > rdf-schema if minor changes to it fix this) Two reasons for only partial compatability: - syntactic: we're not sure if we can organise the XML syntax to "include" a/some/all of the RDF Schema serialisations. - semantic: as you know, the RDF Schema model contains some oddities (classes as members of classes, etc). We might want to make the OWL meta-model simpler. Frank. ----Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 12:28:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:26 UTC