- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:44:00 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Folks, I hope everybody appreciates that I (as well as other members) have put on my "user" hat in these use case / requirements discussions. Actually, I have tried (but maybe not always succeeded) to refrain from proposing a particular language construct. For example, if "input completion" can solve my defaults problem I am happy (in my user role). I also fully appreciate the KR/DL role Ian and Peter play. I agree with Jim that we need to complement these dialectic discussions with a consensus approach, as for example the minimum requirement we formulated during yesterday's teleconf for defaults (the definition of a methodological guideline for users about how to handle defaults in OWL). Guus -- A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15 NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Tel: +31 20 525 6793 Fax: +31 20 525 6896; E-mail: schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl WWW: http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 09:46:49 UTC