www-rdf-interest@w3.org from April 2002 by date

Wednesday, 1 May 2002

• Re: Survey on Query Languages/Tools for RDF/S, DAML+OIL, TopicMap Uche Ogbuji

Tuesday, 30 April 2002

• Re: Monkeyfist.com: A simple, prima facie argument in favor of the Semantic Web Jos De_Roo
• Monkeyfist.com: A simple, prima facie argument in favor of the Semantic Web bparsia@email.unc.edu
• Re: Strings and things Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Sean B. Palmer
• Survey on Query Languages/Tools for RDF/S, DAML+OIL, TopicMap Aimilia Maganaraki
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Mark Baker
• Re: Strings and things Mark Baker
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Eugene Kuznetsov
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys - Some statements and proposals Graham Moore
• Ann: Web Services Architecture Requirements published Hugo Haas
• Reality (universal rdf and rdfs namespaces) Karsten Tolle
• RE: Strings and things Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Dan Brickley
• RE: Strings and things Joshua Allen
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Nick Matsakis

Monday, 29 April 2002

• Re: Strings and things Thomas B. Passin
• Re: Strings and things Mark Baker
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Joshua Allen
• RE: Strings and things Joshua Allen
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Aaron Swartz
• Ann: Web Service Description Requirements published Jonathan Marsh
• RE: P3P rdf Ross, Alan D
• P3P rdf Giles Hogben
• Re: Queries and report generation in RDF/N3 Thomas B. Passin
• Strings and things Mark Baker
• rdfs:label and rdfs:comment Graham Klyne
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Bill de hÓra
• Q: RDF Content Model and DAML+OIL tony_hammond@harcourt.com
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Bill de hÓra
• Re: Queries and report generation in RDF/N3 Graham Klyne
• Re: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Murray Spork
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Joshua Allen
• Re: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Murray Spork

Sunday, 28 April 2002

• [OT] HTTP Delegation of representation Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker

Saturday, 27 April 2002

• Re: Announcement: Thea RDF Parser available for download. Dave Beckett
• Announcement: Thea RDF Parser available for download. Vangelis Vassiliadis
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Uche Ogbuji
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Larry Masinter
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Joshua Allen
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Bill de hÓra
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Bill de hÓra
• Re: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Graham Klyne
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Joshua Allen
• Re: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Uche Ogbuji
• "Never underestimate the power of convention!" Uche Ogbuji

Friday, 26 April 2002

• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Bill de hÓra
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Danny Ayers
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Joshua Allen
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Danny Ayers
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Joshua Allen
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Joshua Allen
• FW: I-D ACTION:draft-masinter-dated-uri-03.txt Larry Masinter
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Bill de hÓra
• RE: Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Narahari, Sateesh
• Explicit Disambiguation Via RDF bNodes, more Process Sandro Hawke
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Sandro Hawke
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Mark Baker
• Re: Queries and report generation in RDF/N3 Graham Klyne
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Danny Ayers
• Re: Queries and report generation in RDF/N3 Sean B. Palmer

Thursday, 25 April 2002

• Queries and report generation in RDF/N3 Graham Klyne
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Joshua Allen
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Larry Masinter
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Sandro Hawke
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Manos Batsis
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Pasqualino Assini
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Bill de hÓra
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Bill de hÓra
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Thomas B. Passin
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Danny Ayers
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Thomas B. Passin
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Thomas B. Passin
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Miles Sabin
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Danny Ayers
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Didier VILLEVALOIS
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Miles Sabin
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" (& Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Manos Batsis
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Miles Sabin
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Miles Sabin
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Miles Sabin
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Joshua Allen
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Joshua Allen
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Joshua Allen
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Thomas B. Passin
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Thomas B. Passin
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Thomas B. Passin
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Danny Ayers
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Larry Masinter
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Bill de hÓra

Wednesday, 24 April 2002

• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Bill de hÓra
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Bill de hÓra
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Larry Masinter
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Joshua Allen
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Danny Ayers
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Miles Sabin
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Sandro Hawke
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Nick Matsakis
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Miles Sabin
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Nick Matsakis
• Re: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Danny Ayers
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys GOWADIA, VAIBHAV
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Bill de hÓra
• Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" Mark Baker
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Thomas B. Passin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Bill de hÓra
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Bill de hÓra
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Danny Ayers
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 23 April 2002

• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Danny Ayers
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• Re: Ontologies, inference etc Gerry Wolff
• RE: Ontologies, inference etc Hutchison, Nigel
• Ontologies, inference etc Gerry Wolff
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Danny Ayers
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Manos Batsis
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: FW: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Bill de hÓra

Monday, 22 April 2002

• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Danny Ayers
• RE: FW: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Danny Ayers
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: FW: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Dan Brickley
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: FW: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Margaret Green
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: a request for help Vangelis Vassiliadis
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: FW: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• 4/19 VLAB Semantic Web Panel - recap alex wright
• Re: RDF benchmarks Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF benchmarks Jeen Broekstra
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Uche Ogbuji
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Uche Ogbuji
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Mark Baker
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Nick Matsakis

Sunday, 21 April 2002

• RE: RDF benchmarks Danny Ayers
• RDF benchmarks Geoff Chappell

Saturday, 20 April 2002

• It is like DCMI five years ago (Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Sigfrid Lundberg, NetLab

Friday, 19 April 2002

• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Andy Powell
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Dan Brickley
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS john.nj.davies@bt.com
• Re: Google API -> Jena Dan Brickley
• Re: Google API -> Jena Dave Reynolds
• Re: Google API -> Jena R.V.Guha
• Re: Google API -> Jena Geoff Chappell
• RE: Google API -> Jena Danny Ayers
• RE: Google API -> Jena Dan Brickley
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS by way of
• RE: Google API -> Jena Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Google API -> Jena Danny Ayers
• Google API -> Jena Jeremy Carroll
• Open PhD Position - Project SWWS "Semantic Web Enabled Web Services" Alexander Maedche

Thursday, 18 April 2002

• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Danny Ayers
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Bill de hÓra
• a request for help chas@uchicago.edu
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Graham Klyne
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS R.V.Guha
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Bill de hÓra
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Sigfrid Lundberg, NetLab
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Geoff Chappell
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Graham Klyne
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Sigfrid Lundberg, NetLab
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Libby Miller
• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Sigfrid Lundberg, NetLab
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Danny Ayers
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Dan Brickley
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 17 April 2002

• Re: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Dan Brickley
• Re: FW: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS R.V.Guha
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Margaret Green
• FW: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Margaret Green
• FW: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Margaret Green
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Danny Ayers
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Ashok Malhotra
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS Margaret Green
• XML Schema vs DAML/RDF/RDFS R.V.Guha
• PhD and Post-Doc Positions at AIFB, Karlsruhe Gerd Stumme

Tuesday, 16 April 2002

• Comments as part of the Graph [was: Re: n3s - A Notation3 Preprocessor] Sean B. Palmer
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• Re: n3s - A Notation3 Preprocessor tony_hammond@harcourt.com
• Constraints: Content model - how to? tony_hammond@harcourt.com
• CFP (extended deadline): Ontologies in Agent Systems at AAMAS'02 Stephen Cranefield
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Uche Ogbuji

Monday, 15 April 2002

• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Aaron Swartz
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Lars Marius Garshol
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Lars Marius Garshol
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• ANN: Introductory article on Versa Uche Ogbuji
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• RE: silly question about rdf:about Manos Batsis
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• RE: silly question about rdf:about Miles Sabin
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Uche Ogbuji
• RE: '#' exit document space? (was: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Joshua Allen
• n3s - A Notation3 Preprocessor Sean B. Palmer

Sunday, 14 April 2002

• Re: silly question about rdf:about Lars Marius Garshol
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Lars Marius Garshol
• Announcement: SemanticWeb.Gr web site Vangelis Vassiliadis

Saturday, 13 April 2002

• RE: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components Charlie Abela

Friday, 12 April 2002

• Clarification on proposed requirement David Booth
• RE: A New Specification for Managing Metadata Narahari, Sateesh
• A New Specification for Managing Metadata John Punin
• Re: rdf:resource, reference to same-named attributes and elements in the same namespace by way of
• ISWC2002: call for participation (registration open) Jerome Euzenat
• DAML+OIL Ontology Editor Ian Horrocks
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Mark Baker
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Larry Masinter

Thursday, 11 April 2002

• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Danny Ayers
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• FW: Protege-2000 1.7 Release Danny Ayers
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Sandro Hawke
• Re: '#' exit document space? (was: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Graham Klyne
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Giles Hogben
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Nick Matsakis
• RE: '#' exit document space? (was: Documents, Cars, Hills, and V alleys) Miles Sabin
• Re: '#' exit document space? (was: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Nick Matsakis
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Giles Hogben
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Graham Klyne
• '#' exit document space? (was: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys) Graham Klyne
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Mark Nottingham
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Nick Matsakis
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 10 April 2002

• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Aaron Swartz
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Aaron Swartz
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Dan Brickley
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Dan Brickley
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Dan Brickley
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Mark Nottingham
• Re: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Sandro Hawke
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Manos Batsis
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Manos Batsis
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Bill de hÓra
• isa:Nest & has:resource tony_hammond@harcourt.com
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• Re: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Mark Baker
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Joshua Allen

Tuesday, 9 April 2002

• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Miles Sabin
• RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Larry Masinter
• RE: silly question about rdf:about Graham Klyne
• Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys Sean B. Palmer

Monday, 8 April 2002

• Re: silly question about rdf:about Seth Russell
• RE: silly question about rdf:about Miles Sabin
• RE: silly question about rdf:about Joshua Allen
• RE: Why Hash? Joshua Allen
• Re: Why Hash? Sandro Hawke
• RE: silly question about rdf:about Graham Moore
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Nikita Ogievetsky
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Nikita Ogievetsky
• Re: silly question about rdf:about David Allsopp
• RE: silly question about rdf:about Bill de hÓra
• Re: Why Hash? Graham Klyne
• Treating Ordinary XML as RDF Graham Klyne
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web franklin.reynolds@nokia.com
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Nikita Ogievetsky
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• Re: silly question about rdf:about R.V.Guha
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Thomas B. Passin
• Re: silly question about rdf:about R.V.Guha
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Nikita Ogievetsky
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Why Hash? Uche Ogbuji
• Re: silly question about rdf:about R.V.Guha
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Sandro Hawke

Sunday, 7 April 2002

• Re: silly question about rdf:about R.V.Guha
• RE: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components Stephen Cranefield
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Dan Brickley
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Sandro Hawke
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Dave Beckett
• UDDI, RDF and Semweb? Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Dave Beckett
• FW: [Chat] Common Logic, return of the KIF Bill de hÓra
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Seth Russell
• Re: Why Hash? R.V.Guha
• RE: Why Hash? Larry Masinter
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Dave Beckett
• Re: Why Hash? Uche Ogbuji
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Aaron Swartz
• Re: Why Hash? Aaron Swartz
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Dave Beckett
• silly question Enrico Silterra
• Why Hash? Sandro Hawke
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Uche Ogbuji
• Re: New I-D: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration Uche Ogbuji

Saturday, 7 April 2001

• RE: QNames for Better Visuals? Lee Jonas

Sunday, 7 April 2002

• Re: silly question about rdf:about Nikita Ogievetsky
• New I-D: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 6 April 2002

• Re: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components David Saff
• Re: silly question about rdf:about Seth Russell
• silly question about rdf:about Sandro Hawke
• OpenCyc 0.6 Bill de hÓra
• Re: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Graham Klyne

Friday, 5 April 2002

• RE: QNames for Better Visuals? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: QNames for Better Visuals? Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• Re: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components Uche Ogbuji
• Re: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components Andrei Lopatenko
• Re: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components Uche Ogbuji
• Re: QNames for Better Visuals? Uche Ogbuji
• Re: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components Seth Russell
• Re: QNames for Better Visuals? Emmanuel Pietriga
• RE: QNames for Better Visuals? Danny Ayers
• Re: QNames for Better Visuals? Thomas B. Passin
• QNames for Better Visuals? tony_hammond@harcourt.com
• Re: Fuzzy clustering for semantic web AS Poeran
• Re: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components Andrei Lopatenko
• Re: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Joseph Reagle
• Re: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Aaron Swartz
• Re: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Joseph Reagle
• Re: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Aaron Swartz

Thursday, 4 April 2002

• Re: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Joseph Reagle
• Re: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Dave Reynolds
• New Version of RDF Web Scraper available Aditya Kalyanpur
• Re: n3 suggestion: comma, semi-colon, and period; Versioning Thomas B. Passin
• Re: n3 suggestion: comma, semi-colon, and period; Versioning Tim Berners-Lee
• Article: Managing structured Web service metadata Uche Ogbuji

Wednesday, 3 April 2002

• Re: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components Charlie Abela
• RE: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Graham Klyne
• n3 suggestion: comma, semi-colon, and period; Versioning Sandro Hawke
• RE: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 2 April 2002

• Re: Program Semantics -- Lexica, Logics, Ontologies, Semiotica, Syn-Taxonomies David Sallach
• Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web Joseph Reagle
• ECML/PKDD-Workshop "Semantic Web Mining" CFP Gerd Stumme
• RE: ANN: Joseki, an RDF server for Jena Seaborne, Andy
• Re: OPML+RDF/XTM? Thomas B. Passin
• Re: RDF ontology for describing reusable software components David Saff

Monday, 1 April 2002

• RE: OPML+RDF/XTM? Danny Ayers
• Re: OPML+RDF/XTM? Graham Klyne
• Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Jim Hendler
• Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies,thesauri, lexicons? Frank Manola
• Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Bill Andersen
• Program Semantics: available ontologies, taxonomies AND logics? David Sallach
• Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Bill Andersen
• Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Frank van Harmelen
• Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? John F. Sowa
• Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Bill Andersen
• Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri,lexicons? asun Gomez-perez
• Re: OPML+RDF/XTM? Thomas B. Passin

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 21:01:44 UTC