- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:40:52 +0100
- To: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> It is called "urn:". I suggest that people use "urn:" when > they are not pointing to documents and can't find (or > invent) a better scheme. Actually, "urn:" is further divided into namespaces, which may each necessarily identify a subclass of resources. However, the "tag:" URI scheme and "urn:tag:" URN NID (currently both in the registration process) have no such restrictions, and make good identifiers for anything. "uuid:" and "esl:" are also relevant (but unregistered...) URI schemes. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 12:40:58 UTC